Epstein Secrets

dissatisfied with that result. . . . . [You], Professor Dershowitz, former Solicitor [General] Starr, former United

William Clinton, Donald Trump, Kevin Spacey, and Alan Dershowitz, and other “prominent businessmen, aca

han two months[] ago, it has become clear that several attorneys on your legal team are dissatisfied with that result. . . . . [You], Professor Dershowitz, former Solicitor [General] Starr, former United States Attorney Lewis, Ms. Sanchez and Messrs. Black, Goldberger and Lefcourt previously had the o

nvestigation, identified him as a wealthy Palm Beach resident with influential contacts, including William Clinton, Donald Trump, Kevin Spacey, and Alan Dershowitz, and other “prominent businessmen, academics and scientists.”210 Villafaña, Lourie, Sloman, and Acosta learned of this press coverage early in the

rough a plea agreement, including a plea that calls for the imposition of a specific, predetermined sentence. USAM §§ 9-27.330, 9-27.400; see also Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1). 206 OPR also considered whether Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, Lourie, or Villafa

r the government, but not Jane Doe 3. The admissions sought by petitioners concerning the government's collection or awareness of information about Alan Dershowitz's whereabouts are simply not relevant to their claim that the government violated the CVRA. Whether the government collected or became aware of any i

ause the requests seek admissions either pertaining to Jane Doe 3's claims of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz or pertaining to the possibility that Dershowitz may have witnessed sexual abuse. On April 7, 2015, the Court denied petitioners' motion to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as petitioners in this cas

a July 6, 2007, letter from Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz to four members of the USAO-SDFL, Alan

vernment." See supra at 1-3. The Respondent also objects to Requests No. 26(a)-26(e) as calling for responses that are protected from disclosure by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), by the law enforcement investigative privilege, and by the work product doctrine. Notwithstanding the foregoing objection, the Resp

nly to see then-State Attorney Barry Krischer kick the case to a grand jury Mr. Krischer backed off when one of Epsteinb gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims had posted MySpace comments about their alco- hol and marijuana use. Epsteinb "best" defense has been that he

en one of Epsteinb gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims had posted

ff when one of Epsteinb gold-plated attor- neys, Alan Dershowitz, announced that some of the victims h

quire confidentiality) (Supp.A.-8.) Federal law imposes no such preemption of the Florida constitution and common law in this case. In particular, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) does not restrict access to the NPA. Federal Rule 6(e) restrains grand jurors, court reporters, government attorneys, interpreters a

h Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger, et al., 2

quire confidentiality) (Supp.A.-8.) Federal law imposes no such preemption of the Florida constitution and common law in this case. In particular, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) does not restrict access to the NPA. Federal Rule 6(e) restrains grand jurors, court reporters, government attorneys, interpreters a

looseleaf service updated annually). 3A Charles Alan Wright, Federa 1 Practice and Procedure SS 761-7

the offender to the custody of the United States Marshal for proceedings under Section 3148. In this instance, judicial officers are also bound by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 46. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 46(e) provides that "[t]he court must declare the bail forfeited if a condition of the bond is b

en & Sir- cusa ("RMJS"), and others, principally Alan Garfinkel and Leigh Katzman, form- ing Katzman Ga

n confidential. As such, they are protected by the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel and the express language of Rule 410 and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(0. FED. R. EvID. 410 (discussions made during plea negotiations are "not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the

xie Highway, West Pahnl3each, EL 3.340 . Ow.: ; I . • • ; .141 1,.0 i • : ., - ' . . i I: ! . - . : • . • - .•:il : r !, .!• . I Alan qoldberger; EN:, Atterbuty Goldberger, et al, 250 S.:AnStrialitair;Aire., Ste; 1400, West IN; ... ': ' Palm Beach, FL 33401..(4a: . ); and Bradley

jury matter that is SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00231362 17 1 absolutely 100 percent protected from 2 disclosure by Federal Rule of Criminal 3 Procedure Six. I have a copy of that rule 4 for the Court. 5 THE COURT: Let me take a look of 6 that, please. 7 MR. GOLDBERGER: Give us o

or Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) and on, Jr. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

jury matter that is SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00232482 17 1 absolutely 100 percent protected from 2 disclosure by Federal Rule of Criminal 3 Procedure Six. I have a copy of that rule 4 for the Court. 5 THE COURT: Let me take a look of 6 that, please. 7 MR. GOLDBERGER: Give us o

h Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger, et al.,■

quire confidentiality) (Supp.A.-8.) Federal law imposes no such preemption of the Florida constitution and common law in this case. In particular, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) does not restrict access to the NPA. Federal Rule 6(e) restrains grand jurors, court reporters, government attorneys, interpreters a