Epstein Secrets

ime the story is re told [sic] it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms [sic] that Alan Derschowitz [sic] is involved in having sexual relations with her, which he denies. Ms claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicis

f the media obtained copies of the motion, printed the "lurid" details in tabloid news publications, and sought comment from Ms. Maxwell, Professor Dershowitz and others. On January 2, 2015, UK lawyers for Ms. Maxwell sent representatives of British media organizations an email containing "a quotable stat

blications, and sought comment from Ms. Maxwell, Professor Dershowitz and others. On January 2, 2015, UK lawyers for M

"forced" to have sex with Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, "model scout" Jean Luc Brunel, and "m

the court, the use of the qualifier made the question fundamentally ambiguous requiring dismissal of the count. The government, at page 133 of its Response, incorrectly suggests that the burden was on Ms. Maxwell or her counsel to clarify the confused questions, particularly regarding the infinite time

ICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. NON PARTY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HIS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION NOT TO EXCEED EIGHTEEN (18) PAGES Alan M. Dershowit

ne Does 3 and 4 filed a Motion for Joinder in this action (DE 279), which included slanderous allegations against Alan M. Dershowitz (herein "Prof. Dershowitz.") 2. Prof. Dershowitz filed a motion for limited intervention for the limited purposes of moving to strike the outrageous and impertinent allegat

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. NON PARTY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FI

' Response and the amount of material attached thereto, Prof. Dershowitz will need the agreed upon extra eight (8) pages to adequately reply to the Response. Prof. Dershowitz's Reply is due to be filed this Monday, February 2, 2015. 6. Counsel for Jane Does 1 - 4 have agreed that they do not oppose the

9102 pressure against prosecuting the case. The team of attorneys included Mr. Black and his firm, Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz.' As explained in the Declaration of Epstein knew of the state investigation by the first week of October, 2005. On October 18, 2005, a search war

Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz.' As explained in the Declaration of Epstein kn

Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz.' As explained in the Declaration of

he litigant standing to challenge the validity of that subpoena." In re Grand Jury, Ill F.3d 1066, 1073 (3d Cir. 1997)(collecting On page 38 of its Response, the government finally admits what it is looking for: evidence of sexual exploitation of minors, including surveillance camera footage, "computer p

:/hhecareerist.typepad.comithecareerist/ 2016/04/alan•dershowitz•on-the-record.html (last viewed May 9,

es by over-laying some novel "common interest" agreement with her own attorneys. Furthermore, Jack Scarola (attorney for Edwards and Cassell in the Dershowitz case) is, according to Plaintiff, a party to the Joint Defense Agreement and identified in communications regarding the CVRA case (presumably under

irm that that his communications with Plaintiff regarding "media issues" were primarily for the purpose of providing legal advice. According to the Response "Ms. received legal advice from Mr. Pottinger regarding how to handle media inquiries in such a way as to not jeopardize her position in ongoing li

500 Fifth Avenue, 33rd Floor New York, NY 10110 Alan Levine Cooley LLP The Grace Building 1114 Aven

21, 2010. 2. The term "Demand" means the Demand for Arbitration filed in this arbitration on May 5, 2010. 3. The term "Zwim Response" means the Response filed in this arbitration by D.B. Zwim Partners, LLC, D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P., DBZ GP, LLC, Zwirn Holdings, LLC, and Daniel Zwim in this arbitration

d and Facsmile this ( klay of May, 2009 to: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., ... . ---- Aiterbury Goldberge

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY D COMES NOW, Intervener, B.B. and file this Response t ndant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it. P mg on the production of the NM agre