Epstein Secrets

's Office Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: July 11, 2019 Su

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

's Office Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: July 11, 2019 Su

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

f New York The SihioJ. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 November 18, 2

r materials from prison were self-authenticating under Rules 902(2) and 902(4) and that "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1), incorporated into Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 27, accords with our analysis."). EFTA00068497 Page 6 III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Court should determine t

's Office Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: July 11, 2019 Su

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

y for the Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Assistant Unit

hallenge. "Although the Government did not present 71 EFTA00088873 evidence regarding the circumstances surrounding the seizure of the USB drive, Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(4) permits authentication based on Mlle appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics of t

UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee Virginia L. Giuffre. ANDREW G. CELLI JR. (David A. Lebowitz, on the brief),

t court's decision whether to discharge or retain a Receiver); see also FTC. v. Standard Fin. Mgmt. Corp., 830 F.2d 404, 409 (1st Cir. 1987) (citing Federal Rule of Evidence 401's "having any tendency" definition of relevance in determining whether documents were "judicial documents"). 1' As we explain below, th

's Office Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: July 11, 2019 Su

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

's Office Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: July 11, 2019 Su

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

rmer AUSAs Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, Andrew C. Lourie, and Ann Marie C. Villafaña. Each sub

evidence. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility of their obtaining monetary damages through either a c

rmer AUSAs Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, Andrew C. Lourie, and Ann Marie C. Villafana. Each subje

as evidence. See Fed! R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility' of their obtaining monetary damages through either a ci