Epstein Secrets

correspondence further stated: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issue

unnecessary, Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986), and any doubts in this regard should be resolved against the moving party. Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970). The movant "bears the initial responsibility of informing the district court of the basis for its mo

ck, NY, of counsel), for Plaintiffs-Appellants. ANDREW R. KOSLOFF, New York, NY (Kent T. Stauffer, Litig

mmary judgment in the district court, we treat the evidence presented to the district court in the light most favorable to the nonmovart plaintiffs. Adickes v. S.H. Kress 8 Co., 398 U.S. 144. 157.90 S. Ct. 1598. 1608.26 L Ed. 2d 142 (1970); Thrasher v. Slate Pam; Fire B Casualty Co.. 734 F.2d 637. 638 (

correspondence further stated: Andy [i.e., AUSA Andrew Laurie] recommended that some of the timing issue

unnecessary, Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986), and any doubts in this regard should be resolved against the moving party. Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970). The movant "bears the initial responsibility of informing the district court of the basis for its mo