Epstein Secrets

ase No. 08-CV-80893-Marra/Johnson Epstein's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Jane Doe's Injunction Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein has international financial contacts (Id. 'l[9); (3) Epstein reportedly limited his clients to those

junction Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein h

the assertion of the fifth amendment does not substitute for evidence needed to meet the burden of production"); Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1304 (11th Cir. 2009) (recognizing that "dismissal following the assertion of the Fifth Amendment violates the Constitution where th

, Jane Doe has alleged that Epstein has international contacts, having travelled overseas with such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. Is Epstein contesting that he has these international travels? Here again, it is impossible to tell because Epstein has not ex

th such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. Is Epstein contesting that h

o provide some sort of independent evidence to obtain an adverse inference.1 The other case cited by Epstein -- Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2009) -- is likewise unavailing. There, a defendant presented an affidavit to the district court that attached attorney-

tein Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marratlohnson Epstein's Memorandum of taw in Opposition to Jane Doe's In/unction Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein has international financial contacts ULL 19); (3) Epstein reportedly limited his clients to those w

n Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein h

the assertion of the fifth amendment does not substitute for evidence needed to meet the burden of production")• Eagle Hospital Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1304 (11th Cir. 2009) (recognizing that "dismissal following the assertion of the Fifth Amendment violates the Constitution where th