Epstein Secrets

, Jane Doe has alleged that Epstein has international contacts, having travelled overseas with such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. Is Epstein contesting that he has these international travels? Here again, it is impossible to tell because Epstein has not ex

th such famous persons as President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. Is Epstein contesting that h

must provide some kind of “independent evidence” of his fraudulent transfers in order to gain the inference of fraudulent transfers. The first is Avirgan v. Hull, 932 F.2d 1572, 1580 (11th Cir. 1991), in which Plaintiffs who had filed a frivolous lawsuit appealed from a district court decision grantin

ovided any evidence that the Court should not draw an adverse inference – or, indeed, any evidence at all in opposition to her motion. Accordingly, Avirgan is not on point and certainly does not suggest that Jane Doe needs to provide some sort of independent evidence to obtain an adverse inference.1

ase No. 08-CV-80893-Marra/Johnson Epstein's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Jane Doe's Injunction Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein has international financial contacts (Id. 'l[9); (3) Epstein reportedly limited his clients to those

junction Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein h

lent] billing ... which in tum ensures that the proposed adverse inferences, should the jury choose to draw them, are not unreliable." Id. See also Avirgan v. Hull, 932 F.2d 1572, 1580 (11th Cir. 1991) (holding that "the negative inference to be drawn from the assertion of the fifth amendment does not s

tein Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marratlohnson Epstein's Memorandum of taw in Opposition to Jane Doe's In/unction Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein has international financial contacts ULL 19); (3) Epstein reportedly limited his clients to those w

n Motion Page 8 of 24 close friends with Prince Andrew and therefore it is reasonable to infer Epstein h

inferences drawn from Fifth-Amendment-protected silence are treated as a substitute for the need for evidence on an ultimate issue of fact," citing Avirgan, supra). As belabored throughout this memorandum, Jane Doe cites no independent evidence that Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets. Accordi