Epstein Secrets

enies Epstein Tie,” New York Post, Oct. 6, 2007; “Andrew Pal Faces Sex List Shame,” Mail on Sunday, Oct.

e described unless there is an appropriate, articulable reason not to do so.” Id., Art. II, ¶ C. 399 Id., Art. IV, ¶ B.1. 400 Searcy v. Paletz, 2007 WL 1875802, at *5 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007) (an inmate is not considered a crime victim for purposes of the CVRA until the government has filed c

pute the allegations. 4l See, e.g., Paul Harris, Prince Andrew’s Link to Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Taints Roy

ded that a victim of uncharged conduct should not be afforded statutory protections.'°! Yet none of these cases—United States v. Turner,'°? Searcy v. Paletz,'® or Searcy v. Skinner'°*—provide strong support for OLC’s position. Turner is a particularly poor fit. Although OLC’s memorandum characterizes Turn

ok at the CVRA's purposes, language, and judicial interpretations. This Part looks at each of these three issues in turn. 41 See, e.g., Paul Harris, Prince Andrew's Link to Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Taints Royalty in US, Guardian (Mar. 12, 2011), http://goo.gl/OI4vAE; Landon Thomas Jr., Jeffrey Epstein: Intern

ctim of uncharged conduct should not be afforded statutory protections. !°! Yet none of these cases - United States v. 10 104 Turner, !9? Searcy v. Paletz, !°3 or Searcy v. Skinner - provide strong support for OLC's position. Turner is a particularly 9 See 42 U.S.C. § 10607(c). % Td. § 10607(c)(3)(A).