Epstein Secrets

ority of the bars that might be relied upon by Ms Maxwells require the extradition judge to make a finding

ts, a review that formed the basis of changes to the 2003 Extradition Act. (Id. Annex B ¶ 3.1). In Mr. Perry's opinion, it is "highly unlikely that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able successfully to resist extradition to the United States" in connection with this case. (Perry Rep. 12(e)). After concluding that none

ide any answer on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by

seding indictment dated 7 July 2020. In addition to those conclusions, the following three points may be made. 3. First, as noted in the Opinion2, Ms Maxwell's waiver of extradition would be admissible in any extradition proceedings in England and Wales. While such a document cannot compel a requested pers

r, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell II EFTA00093319 cailase:20-agloDacument ntlinfiAtIllf0891, 806E128B2Blage34figrl 3tI 4 Exhibit A EFTA00093320 Ckast.20-U-0003.00dblit DOditrehlei

S.C. § 3142(c)(1XBXi); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00093333 cSis ztrzerocuacbmtint bbewittill121€21F00582910/i2Og afaj

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00066960 counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00083756 counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00086919 counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00093430 counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00099914 counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or

to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No. 18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL 6344202, at *2 n.7 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2018). IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 97, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2020 New York, New York 22 ALISON J. NATHAN United

se approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest..

these numbers from memory. According to the Macalvins report, [the financial figures] are a close approximation of the value of the assets that Ms. Maxwell held in her own name at the time of her arrest.... For the reasons already discussed, Ms. Maxwell was reluctant to discuss anything about her [spou

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. 20-CR-330 (MN) OPINION AND

C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with 5 EFTA00154330 counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or

d 04/07/16 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern and Eastern Di

intiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

ffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HA

ne Maxwell, Defendant. MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, I BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, hereby move this Court for an Order for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to appear as counsel for Plaintiff, VI