Epstein Secrets

ited States District Court Southern District of New York Re: Reply in Support of Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal)i United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a simple request: that she be permitted to disclose under seal to the Second

ernment touts its production of "more than 165,000 pages of discovery to the defense," of which (they neglect to mention), nearly 90,000 of the Ms. Maxwell has filed a letter motion which seeks leave to file this reply under seal, while providing the unredacted version to the government and the Court. T

y Protective Order (Under Seal)i United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Def

(they neglect to mention), nearly 90,000 of the Ms. Maxwell has filed a letter motion which seeks leave to fi

domain, and which are entitled to privacy and confidentiality" are discretionary and "form an integral part of trial management"); United States v. Wecht, 484 F.3d 194, 211 (3d Cir. 2007), as amended (July 2, 2007) ("it would have been proper for the District Court to unseal the records pursuant to i

2Tfir3N33(IDACIDMEEDdillibiligQ911031200309101528% ef15of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED noC 0: un rr. FILED: 9/2/20 20-CR-330 (MN) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHA

OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY

DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

he standard for "good cause" in the civil context when evaluating whether to modify a protective order entered in a criminal case); United States v. Wecht, 484 F.3d 194, 211 (3rd Cir. 2007) (same). 2 EFTA00097199 Caseas2Cealig3GDACOMEDitiant91202QIER909R)272eafitteiSof 5 case in other civil proceed

ase 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 51 Filed 09/02/20 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED noC *: Dn FF. FILED: 9/2/20 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALISON J. NATH

OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY

DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

he standard for "good cause" in the civil context when evaluating whether to modify a protective order entered in a criminal case); United States v. Wecht, 484 F.3d 194, 211 (3rd Cir. 2007) (same). 2 EFTA00101996 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 51 Filed 09/02/20 Page 3 of 5 case in other civil proc

ase 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 51 Filed 09/02/20 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 9/2/20 20-CR-330 (MN) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN,

OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY

DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTR

he standard for "good cause" in the civil context when evaluating whether to modify a protective order entered in a criminal case); United States v. Wecht, 484 F.3d 194, 211 (3rd Cir. 2007) (same). 2 EFTA00026706 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 51 Filed 09/02/20 Page 3 of 5 case

as212-6r310193MACINnEEIVANN95202QIERVON0:37217a Fab efi5of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 9/2/20 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN,

OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY

DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

he standard for "good cause" in the civil context when evaluating whether to modify a protective order entered in a criminal case); United States v. Wecht, 484 F.3d 194, 211 (3rd Cir. 2007) (same). 2 EFTA00028056 --- PAGE BREAK --- CaseaseaeratIMIDACWEEDitiebile109120aQIERSOM92eaptefraof 5 case in