Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATI

ISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Av

enue Denver, Colorado 80203 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00104411 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARGUMENT 3 I. The Court Should Not Apply the Annabi Rule and Instead Find that the NPA Bars Ms. Maxwell'

e Annabi Rule and Instead Find that the NPA Bars Ms. Maxwell's Prosecution on Counts One, Three, Five, and Six

er alleged abuse to the FBI, at a time when the events were most fresh in her mind, is extraordinarily significant. It 5 The government argues that Cambindo Valencia is inapposite because it contends that the charges against the defendant's wife were dismissed because her prosecution violated the defendant's plea

001) 12 North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969) II, 12, 13 United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) passim United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1979) 13, 14 United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1972) 10 United States v. Dionisio, 503 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO

RN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL MOTIONS RELATING TO THE S2 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Av

lorado 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00103758 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT SUMMARY OF NEW ALLEGATIONS IN THE S2 INDICTMENT 4 ARGUMENT 5 I. The NPA Bars Ms.

E S2 INDICTMENT 4 ARGUMENT 5 I. The NPA Bars Ms. Maxwell's Prosecution on Counts One, Three, Five, and Six

passim 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987) 22, 23 United States v. Brown, No. 99-1230(L), 2002 WL 34244994 (2d Cir. Apr. 26, 2002) 16 United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1979) 20 United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1972) 17 United States v. Garcia-Gonzalez, 714 F.3d 306 (5th C

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 317 Filed 08/13/21 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC N: DATE FILED:8/13/21 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

cking count and sex trafficking conspiracy count. The Court did not address the new charges in the April 16, 2021 Opinion & Order. On May 25, 2021, Maxwell filed another round of pretrial motions seeking to dismiss the S2 indictment in whole or in part and to compel discovery. Dkt. No. 292, 293. For app

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTR

ht not be permissible against a defendant whose charges were dismissed after her husband pleaded guilty. Dkt. No. 293 at 19 (citing United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1979)). However, the Court agrees with the Government that the result in Cambindo Valencia rested on the terms of the husban