Epstein Secrets

t's response to, and that is the contention that Ms. Maxwell, through counsel, kept in touch with the governm

URT: there is one assertion in the defense papers that I don't think I have seen the government's response to, and that is the contention that Ms. Maxwell, through counsel, kept in touch with the government since the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00093148 Case 21-770, Docume

ay in order to protect her privacy. The following are the words of Jane Doe which I will read from her written statement. Jane Doe wrote: "I knew Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. It was her calculating and sadistic manipulation that anesthetized me, in order to deliver me, with full knowledge of the heino

n order to deliver me, with full knowledge of the heinous and dehumanizing abuse that awaited me, straight to the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Without Ghislaine, Jeffrey could not have done what he did. She was in charge. She egged him on and encouraged him. She told me of others she recruited and she thou

man Loera, and Mr. Raniere combined. ALL U.S. MEDIA COVERAGE COMPARISON (90 DAYS OF ARREST) 7.000 6.000 6000 6.000 6 too° 3 2.000 1000 0 GM IS LAIN E MAXWELL •la ray Weinst•in Erri"nrEME‘rantrrrIMMTI. . Bill Catty JC•ClUll% Guzman Leera Keith Raffle's 21 EFTA00093242 C6set1211-Z7

o had introduced herself as Janet Marshall, who had toured the house and participated in these conversations about the purchase, was the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. That series of facts, which I just learned about this morning, your Honor, are concerning for two reasons. First, additionally, it appears that t

t not the legal standing, your Honor. They also say nothing about the burden, which is discussed on a case written for the Second Circuit by Judge Raggi, and also the U.S. v. English case. Without going into a lot of detail, as the court is aware, the burden of persuasion is the government's. It nev

T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: New York, N.Y. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) x Teleconference Arraignment Bail Hearing July 14, 2020 3:05 p.m. HON. ALISON

S, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00066216 k7e2MaxC kjc THE COURT: Good afternoon, everyone. This is Judge Nathan presiding. This is United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 330. I will take appearances from counsel, beginning with

I will take appearances from counsel, beginning with counsel for the defendant. : Good afternoon, your Honor. Mark Cohen, Cohen & Gresser, for Ms. Maxwell. Also appearing with me today is my partner Chris Everdell of Cohen & Gresser and Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger of the Haddon Morgan firm. Good

on, your Honor. Mark Cohen, Cohen & Gresser, for Ms. Maxwell. Also appearing with me today is my partner Chri

o had introduced herself as Janet Marshall, who had toured the house and participated in these conversations about the purchase, was the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. That series of facts, which I just learned about this morning, your Honor, are concerning for two reasons. First, additionally, it appears that t

t not the legal standing, your Honor. They also say nothing about the burden, which is discussed on a case written for the Second Circuit by Judge Raggi, and also the U.S. v. English case. Without going into a lot of detail, as the court is aware, the burden of persuasion is the government's. It nev

York, NY 10007 Tuesday, October 13, 2020, 2:00pm Panel: Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi, CM. Docket number Case name Time allotted 20-2413-cv (12) v. Ghislaine Maxwell Julie Brown, Miami Hearld Co., et al ] (12) 20-3061-cv United States of America ) v. Ghislaine Maxwell ) ) Time to be shared. EFTA00032483

me Time allotted 20-2413-cv (12) v. Ghislaine Maxwell Julie Brown, Miami Hearld Co., et al ] (12) 2

r Case name Time allotted 20-2413-cv (12) v. Ghislaine Maxwell Julie Brown, Miami Hearld Co., et al ]

ue Courtroom 1703 Thurgood Marshall US Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Tuesday, October 13, 2020, 2:00pm Panel: Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi, CM. Docket number Case name Time allotted 20-2413-cv (12) v. Ghislaine Maxwell Julie Brown, Miami Hearld Co., et al ] (12) 20-3061-cv Uni

e to advise about possibility of denaturalization - First on A calendar; scheduled to start at 10:00 am (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) United States v. Maxwell arguing - Pre-trial appeal: whether district court's order denying D's motion to modify protective order is subject to interlocutory appeal; wheth

el claim based on failure to advise about possibility of denaturalization - First on A calendar; scheduled to start at 10:00 am (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) United States v. Maxwell arguing - Pre-trial appeal: whether district court's order denying D's motion to modify protective order is subject to