Epstein Secrets

States Court of Appeals for the Second Cir- cuit seemed poised to release some documents in the case. The records involve Epstein's one-time partner, Ghislaine Max- well, who has been accused of helping him recruit and sex- ually exploit girls and young women in various locations around the United States and abroad in

need for the New been fighting for a decade to have the York appeals court to expedite unsealing deal thrown out and to pressure the the documents in Maxwell's case. Justice Department to prosecute the That case is a 2015 defamation law- 66-year-old multimillionaire on sex suit filed against Maxwell, the d

. The records involve Epstein's one-time partner, Ghislaine Max- well, who has been accused of helping him re

y and, therefore, it's more urgent than ever that the Maxwell case be made public. "[Pak $] submission makes cl

ents that [the Her- ald and other parties] seek in [the Max- well] matter remains an issue of critical public concern," Bohrer wrote in a let- ter to Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, clerk of the court for the appeals panel. He said the government "essentially argues that Epstein's victims are not entitled to any meaningful redre

No. 21-770 & 21-58 In the ZiRita) *tates Court of Apprat5 for the *mufti Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20-CR-330 (AJN) Appellant Ghislaine Ma

. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20-CR-330 (AJN) Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to the Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release Leah S. Saffian LAW OFFICES OF LEAH SAFFIAN 15546 Meadowgate Road Encino, California 91436-3

t Order April 27, 2021 EFTA00089468 CaseQa20-20-6191WilfslerDifituraetit7221321FiNB04/a/Eligftget of 4 21.58-cr (L), 21.770-cr United States v. Maxwell United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the

A. We press our concerns regarding disruption of Ms. Maxwell's sleep and the deleterious effect sleep depriva

. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EXHIBIT A EFTA00089469 Exhibit B Doc. 282 Lower Court Order May 14, 2021 EFTA00089470 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 282 F

. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20-CR-330 (AJN) Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release Leah S. Saffian LAW OFFICES OF LEAH SAFFIAN 15546 Meadowgate Road Encino, California 91436-3429 Tel: (858)4

21, 3102450, Paget of 14 No. 21-770 & 21-58 In the Malta *tates Court of Appeat5 for the *tomb Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20-CR-330 (AJN) Appellant Ghislaine Ma

for bond (see Ex. A, Order, April 27, 2021), it appeared concerned with the conditions of her confinement during oral argument and instructed Ms. Maxwell that "[t]o the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court." (Id.).

uld be addressed to the District Court." (Id.). Ms. Maxwell did just that, explaining again to the trial judg

. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EXHIBIT A EFTA00096537 Case 21-58. Document 89-2, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Page6 of 20 Exhibit B Doc. 282 Lower Court Order May 1

21.58-cr (L), 21.770-cr United States v. Maxwell United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the

PIERRE N. LEVAL, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. United States of America, Appellee, v. 21-58-cr (L) 21-770-cr Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appellant. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered December 28,

America, Appellee, v. 21-58-cr (L) 21-770-cr Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appel

. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EFTA00023011

Raymond J. Lohier, Jr., Richard J. Sullivan, Circuit Judges. United States of America, ORDER Appellee, Docket Nos. 21-58(L), 21-770(Con) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant — Appellant. Appellant renews her request for pretrial release. In the alternative, she requests that the Cour

Docket Nos. 21-58(L), 21-770(Con) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant — Appellant.

Appellee, Docket Nos. 21-58(L), 21-770(Con) v. Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant — Ap

y hearing on the conditions of her confinement. The Government opposes the motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. For the Court: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EFTA00025551

twenty. Plaintiff-Appellee, ORDER v. 20-2413 Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant. Sharon Churcher,

ef, not to exceed ten (10) double-spaced pages, regarding (I) arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell and (2) Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate this appeal with United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061. The United States shall submit its brief no later than Wednesday, Sep

ed by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell and (2) Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate this appeal with United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061. The United States shall submit its brief no later than Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 3:00 pm. It is also hereby ORDERED that the p

Paget of 2 The hearing scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 2:00 pm is hereby ADJOURNED until further order of the court. For the Court: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EFTA00087972

ef, not to exceed ten (10) double-spaced pages, regarding (I) arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell and (2) Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate this appeal with United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061. The United States shall submit its brief no later than Wednesday, Sep

ed by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell and (2) Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate this appeal with United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061. The United States shall submit its brief no later than Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 3:00 pm. It is also hereby ORDERED that the p

twenty. Plaintiff-Appellee, ORDER v. 20-2413 Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant. Sharon Churcher,

Paget of 2 The hearing scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 2:00 pm is hereby ADJOURNED until further order of the court. For the Court: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EFTA00091438

twenty. Plaintiff-Appellee, ORDER v. 20-2413 Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant. Sharon Churcher,

ef, not to exceed ten (10) double-spaced pages, regarding (I) arguments raised by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell and (2) Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate this appeal with United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061. The United States shall submit its brief no later than Wednesday, Sep

ed by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell and (2) Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate this appeal with United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-3061. The United States shall submit its brief no later than Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 3:00 pm. It is also hereby ORDERED that the p

Paget of 2 The hearing scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 2:00 pm is hereby ADJOURNED until further order of the court. For the Court: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court EFTA00104740

ly thing he might have done wrong was maybe to cross the line a little too closely. Rush advised that Epstein was very upset that Edwards subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell. 9. At no point during this phone call was I told that the discussion was "off the record" or otherwise "confidential". I was never told that ther

n was very upset that Edwards subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell. 9. At no point during this phone call was I to

to d ism i ss the consolidated appeals as moot and to vacate the district court orders of May 21,2010 and June 25, 2010 is GRANTED. FOR THE COURT, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk Joy Fallek, Administrative Attorney EFTA00728459 EXHIBIT 5 EFTA00728460 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I

October, two thousand twenty. PRESENT: Jost A. CABRANES, ROSEMARY S. POOI.ER, REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges. Phrinifff-Appellee, 20-2413-cv v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURC:HER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH

FIRMED. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from a July 23, 2020 order unsealing certain litigation materials, including, and related to, Maxwell's April 2016 deposition transcript. She argues that the District Court abused its discretion in ordering the unsealing of the deposition materials.

be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from a July 23, 2020 order unseal

est of judicial economy, any further appeal in this civil case shall be referred to this panel. The mandate shall issue forthwith. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 3 EFTA00018291 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 20-2413. Document 140-2. 10/19/2020. 2955244, Pagel of 1 United States Court of Appeals for the S