Epstein Secrets

. •526 Fitch & Grant, of New York City (Elihu Root and William D. Guthrie, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Jacob Ruppert. Before WARD, ROGERS, and HOUGH, Circuit Judges. WARD, Circuit Judge. These three cases involve the same question, and in each the appeal is from an order of

order of the district court denying the motion of appellant is affirmed. CITY OF MIANI I SUTTON et al. No. 13113. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 25,1050. Dnrward B. Sutton and Sarah R. Sutton. cluing bald flOkIl as the Sutton Jewelry Com- pany hmnght suit against the City of Miami t

, or abusive sexual conduct involving a minor or ward," as defined by § 2252A(b). 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(b

a, 110 F.3d 260, 263 (5th Cir.1997)). ut see United Page 12 States I Laney. 189 F.3d 954 (9th Cir.1999) (pecuniary gain required). In fact, the Fifth Circuit in Canada found that the defendant's distribution of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors with a purpose of enticing another to ha

rict court selects the sentence arbitrarily, bases the sentence on impermissible factors [or] fails to consider pertinent section 3553(a) factors." Ward. 506 F.3d at 478 (interrhal quotation marks omitted); see also United States I Ausburn. 502 F.3d 313. 328 (3d Cir.2007) (asking if the district co

nce). 10. In Bonner' City of Prichard. 661 F.2d 1206. 1209 (11th Cir.1981) (en bane), we adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit that were rendered prior to October 1, 1981. With this factual background in mind, we turn to whether (when viewed through the prism of abuse of

acted in bad faith in refusing to move for down- ward departure, the Government may then rebut the all

otSet&mt... 6/8/2009 EFTA00182793 Page 2 of 11 Westlaw. 162 F.3d 832 162 F.3d 832 (Cite as: 162 F.3d 832) C United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-40307. Dec. 9, 1998. Defendant was convicted i