3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
20 / 3
Mentions
-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232,
09/17/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 0940469, 09-80581, 09-80656, 0940802, 09-81092.
d as Exhibit 1. 5. Some 13 days later, counsel for Jane Doe No. 4 flied a motion for protective order on September 9, 2009 attempting to prohibit MrEpstein's presence at the deposition. The Defendant immediately filed a response (an Emergency Motion) on September II, 2009 requesting that the coon enter
been justified, however, under these circumstances, it was grandstanding and improper. In that the Plaintiff has stated that she voluntary went to JE's home 50 plus times without trauma until she filed a lawsuit, this brief visual encounter from a distance should not have resulted in the unilater
Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2009 Page 4 of 33 Page 4 the plaintiffs either directly or indirectly. However, there is no prohibition against Mr. F.pstein's attendance at a deposition where, as is reflected in the order, the communication wilt be made to the plaintiff solely through defense counsel wi
LORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACFI hereby Se that. On. day, hefoie me, an ACC* &if itithoiiiid to oaths and take ac/cnowledgmener, personally appeared Jeffrey E. Bpetein known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who wrimowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that
09-00419, 0940581, 0940656, 09-80802, 0941092. Defendant Epstein's Emergency Motion To Strike Plaintiff's Motion F
s the intent of the Court to give the Defendant, Mr. Epstein, and his attorney an opportunity to have this Co
-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 0
ase No. 08-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80993 (S.D. Ha. 2008); Doc No. 6 v. Epstein Case No. 08-80994 (S.D. Fla. 2008)- Doe II v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80469 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 101 v. Epstein Case No. 09-80591 (S.D. Fla. 2009) Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla.
ercial sex act. Page 2 of 9 EFTA00182943 CT DATE(S) DEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 9 November 2004 - March 2005 --a N EPSTEIN ..NEPSTEIN Jane Doe #14 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(aX1) and 2 Knowingly, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, recruiting, enticing, providing, and obtaini
ravel to 358 El Brillo Way so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. Manner and Means 27. The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought to accomplish the purpose and
ments to be made to, minor females in exchange for engaging in lewd conduct. EPSTEIN, (c) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY a/k/a ," and other participants would ask females to recruit other minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (d)
the public association of their identities with Defendant Epstein and these assaults. 3. Dr. Gilbert Kliman,2 a w
ober 28, 2006 132. Lawrence LE, Viron M, Johnson JE, Hudkins A, Samples G, Kliman G: A school-based m
SISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 52 EFTA00182941 INDICTMENT SUMMARY CT DATE(S) kEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 1 2001 - October 2005 NEPSTEIN Jane Does 1-19 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2 Conspiracy to use a facility or means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, or entice minors to enga
se No. 08-80893 (S.D. Ha. 2008); Doe No. 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80993 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 6 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80994 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe II v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80469 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Poe No. 101 v. Epstein Case No. 09-80591 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla
EY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80591-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND IDENTIFY JANE DOE NUMBERS 101 AND 102 IN THIRD PART
CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00182748 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 2 of 8 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 2 JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE
OHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 101 AND 10
v. Epstein Page 4 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Mr. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, her
ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff,
se No. 08-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 08.80993 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 6 v, Epstein, Case No. 08-80994 (SD. Fla. 2008); Doe II v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80469 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 101 v. Epstein Case No. 09-80591 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, Case No. 09.80656 (S.D. Fla
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Doe II v. Epstein

Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Lawrence Krauss
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSON
Dallas
LOCATIONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON