Epstein Secrets

ercial sex act. Page 2 of 9 EFTA00182943 CT DATE(S) DEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 9 November 2004 - March 2005 --a N EPSTEIN ..NEPSTEIN Jane Doe #14 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(aX1) and 2 Knowingly, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, recruiting, enticing, providing, and obtaini

ravel to 358 El Brillo Way so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. Manner and Means 27. The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought to accomplish the purpose and

ments to be made to, minor females in exchange for engaging in lewd conduct. EPSTEIN, (c) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY a/k/a ," and other participants would ask females to recruit other minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. (d)

the public association of their identities with Defendant Epstein and these assaults. 3. Dr. Gilbert Kliman,2 a w

ober 28, 2006 132. Lawrence LE, Viron M, Johnson JE, Hudkins A, Samples G, Kliman G: A school-based m

SISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 52 EFTA00182941 INDICTMENT SUMMARY CT DATE(S) kEFENDANT(S) VICTIM(S) STATUTES/CHARGE 1 2001 - October 2005 NEPSTEIN Jane Does 1-19 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2 Conspiracy to use a facility or means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, or entice minors to enga

ent, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically are public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v. United States District Court, 920 17.2d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"); United States v.

in the above matter. I have prepared a proposed Order, which I believe accurately reflects your ruling at the hearing on June 26, 2009 on Defendant Jeffrey Epstcin's Motion to Stay Disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum Pending Review. By copy of this letter, I am providing all counsel of recor

rt considers in connection with sentencing. Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div See. e.g.. Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein. Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 3. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 4._vinstein, Case No. 08-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2

tial. The only matter before the court today was Defendant Epstein's Motion for a Stay which the court denied. Cont

effrey Epstein Dear Judge Colbath: On behalf of Mr. Epstein, we strongly object to the proposed order submitt

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS OVERNIGHT MAIL The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath Fifteenth Judicial Circuit-Palm Beach P

ent, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically are public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v United States District come 920 F.2d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"); United States v el y

EY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80591-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND IDENTIFY JANE DOE NUMBERS 101 AND 102 IN THIRD PART

CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00182748 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 2 of 8 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 2 JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE

OHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 101 AND 10

v. Epstein Page 4 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Mr. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, her

ICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff,

ent, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically are public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v. United States District Court, 920 17.2d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"); United States v.

UIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08CF009381AXXXMB DIVISION "W' vs. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. AGREED ORDER CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERROR THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the agreement of Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., attorney

84-3070 Attorneys for The Palm Beach Post CONFPITTENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331926 EFTA_00204652 EFTA02729636 State v. Epstein Case No. 2006-CF9454 & 2008-9381CF Notice of Hearing on Palm Beach Post's Motion to Intervene CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a tru

A CASE NO.: 08CF009381AXXXMB DIVISION "W' vs. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. AGREED ORDER CORRECTING SC

A CASE NO.: 08CF009381AXXXMB DIVISION "W' vs. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendant. AGREED ORDER CORRECTING SCR

ent, Judge Pucillo found, was "a significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically arc public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v. United States District Court, 920 F.2d 1462, 1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"). United States v KO