Epstein Secrets

(14416 1 P R/1 SOA(16 EFTA00228253 Pagel of 48 ACCOUNT NUMBER PAYMENT DUE DATE NEW BALANCE MINIMUM OUE 02/13/2004 I St .617.22 I 532.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4TH Ft. NEW YORK NY 100226843 O CHASE Facsimile Copy Chair: Gold MasterCard❑ ACCOUNT NUMBER: NEW BALAN

INIMUM OUE 02/13/2004 I St .617.22 I 532.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4T

r.-. JE FFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE CAD J EPSTEIN CO 4TH Fl. NEW YORK NY 100224843 CHASE Facsími

livarer•••••• fatlaeal Data flee 929 WI 211441 Tin Outs 0.1 010.4144 401114,144 s470.•41414 4•01110 017114 MARIS MIA ROLM •Cia, Pilme.01coari. JEFFREY E EPSTEIN ai Ulialetl YtP1r i a A1100,4482 PA, 213114 mad 11• Void Void Void Void Void. 480,WICIFF0084.1441.4131110AL VA/1044144111048111141014011118 fl YMO

M a Nen ESEnce ..,,,,.E a. Ofs $10 ao S000 (*ISO! SI* 43 Mann Endes. --Sad WI 0 `... 0. 4 ,a' 1/4.1. Mot ea • •••••• EN. <4, K. Pro Ess IMO JE ETA* 00 .1 MECO 014 FL WM VOW NY TOCOMMI 1...1111-11 ..... CHASE 0 CMOIADASEP SERVICE PO SOX 15 113 WHIANOTOIE Cf illebSSIS3 Cavan/ DA, 0.

32.00 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVENUE C/O J. EPSTEIN CO 4TH Ft. NEW YORK NY 100226843 O CHASE Facsi

ly recognizing that computer data relevant to a warrant calbe easily hidden, and may require an in depth forensic review. See, e.g., United States. Adjani, 452 F. 3d 1140 (9th Cir. 2006) (computer files are easy to disguise or misname). Furthermore, courts are increasingly recognizing that computer fo

058 EFTA00228438 )13*.LM BEACH NATIONAL BAN!" & TRUST COMPANY BR: PB RELATIONSHIP APPROVAL TICKET Prepared By: NJB Ill Name of .aPRROWER(S) Jeffrey E. Epstein ORIGINAL DATE First Request MACUNG ADDRESS 457 Madison Ave. 4th Floor OFFICER H. Loy Anderson, Jr. New York, NY 10020 OFFICER I 1 REFERRIN

ST 12 MONTHS SSN ISSUED-67 STATE ISSUED-NY • 048 EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, P 0 BOX 740241, .ATLANTA,GA,30374-0241,800/685-1111 •EPSTEIN,JEFFERY,E SINCE 04/22/77 FAD 05/03/02 457,MADISON,AVE,NEW YORK,NY, 10022,TAPE RPTD 01/99 358,EL BRILLO,WAY,PALM BEACH,FL,33480,TAPE RPTD 08/98 265,E 66TH

RILLO,WAY,PALM BEACH,FL,33480,TAPE RPTD 08/98 265,E 66TH,ST,NEW YORK,NY,10021,TAPE RPTD 04/98 BDS 01 EPIRIMP M SSN VER - Y 02 EP-CONSIMTING PRES,J EPSTEIN CO,NEW YORK,NY 03 E2-,BEARS STEARNS FN -307 •SUM-02/77-05/02,PR/OI-NO,COLL-YES,FB-NO, ACCTS:11,HC$1000-205K, 10-ONES, 1-0TH ER. COLLECTION ITEMS

01 EPIRIMP M SSN VER - Y 02 EP-CONSIMTING PRES,J EPSTEIN CO,NEW YORK,NY 03 E2-,BEARS STEARNS FN -307 •

KET Prepared By: NJB Ill Name of .aPRROWER(S) Jeffrey E. Epstein ORIGINAL DATE First Request MACUNG AD

d States I. Adiani 452 F.3d 1140 (9th Cir. 2006), the court observed that ...the warrant arguably might have provided for a "less invasive search of Adjani's [email) 'inbox' and 'outbox' for the addressees specifically cited in the warrant, as opposed to the wholesale search of the contents of all emai

S DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GRAND JURY MATTER FILED UNDER SEAL IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS ) DUCES TECUM IS D TO ) MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Now comes Jeffrey Epstein and respectfully moves this Honorable

Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, including, but not ling to, retainer agreements; employment agreements; billing statements (whether submitted directly to Mr. Epstein or to a third party for reimbursement); records of the dates when services were performed and the hours worked; ••••••r telephone logs or records

Y SUBPOENAS ) DUCES TECUM IS D TO ) MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUB

illing statements (whether submitted directly to Mr. Epstein or to a third party for reimbursement); records

rth Amendment's particularity requirement and overbreadth prohibition are critical in the context of computer searches. See, e.g., United States v. Adjani, 452 F.3d 1140, 1149 (91h Cir. 2006) ("[w]e understand the heightened specificity concerns in the computer context, given the vast amounts of data

eement of the parties. that appearance was rescheduled for July 17, 2007. The day before that scheduled appearance, i.e.. July 16. 2007. counsel for Jeffrey Epstein, who seeks to intervene in this matter, was informed by Deputy Chief that Riley did not have to appear physically before the grand jury if a motio

nformed by Deputy Chief that Riley did not have to appear physically before the grand jury if a motion to quash the subpoena at issue was filed by Epstein before the end of the day on July 17. 2007. As the Government's Response states. Epstein's motion to quash was filed on July 17, 2007 before the clo

he Response of the United States to the Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Sub

d jury subpoenas to investigator and his firm, Mr. Epstein is represented by undersigned counsel Roy Black.

rth Amendment's particularity requirement and overbreadth prohibition are critical in the context of computer searches. See, e.g., United States v. Adjani, 452 F.3d 1140, 1149 (9th Cir. 2006) ("[wje understand the heightened specificity concerns in the computer context, given the vast amounts of data