Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No: Il UNITE STATES OF AMERICA vs. JE EPSTEIN, and Defendants. 18 U.S.C. § 371 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e) 18 U.S.C. § 2423(d) 18 U.S.C. § 1591(aX2) 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) 18 U.

Way, Palm Beach, Florida so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. Manner and Means 5 EFTA01703056 22. The manner and means by which the defendants and other participants sought to accompli

PSTEIN paid $300 to Jane v-a-p;w_\. Doe #2, who was then a stx4esh-yea.414-girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (16) In or around dairpIrf 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN in the presence of Jane Doe #4, who was then a fifteen-year-old girl. (17

as then a fifteen-year-old girl, and Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen- years-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at 358 El Brillo Way. (43) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN the presence of Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixtee

N a 6/3/0s. Ale -9 At4 48 EFTA01703102 COUNT DATE(S) MINOR(S) INVOLVED DEFENDANT(S) 27 July 2004 through January 31, 2005 Jane Doe #9 JEFFREY EPSTEIN aflo a ' ahtertitItirMSte) 1/26.4 28 Mid-2004 through April 22, 2005 Jane Doe #10 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 29 August 2004 through May 27, 2005 Jane Doe

ORIDA Case No: Il UNITE STATES OF AMERICA vs. JE EPSTEIN, and Defendants. 18 U.S.C. § 371 18

EIN lof Jane Doe #17, who was then  a seventeen-year-old girl. (131) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Janc Doc #17, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, how old she was. CYD*Ci cal s. 4 war /7 (132) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant

Y EPSTEIN RALD LEFCO r RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFR Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

in the woe position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted al trial. No more; no less. From

hearing shall be limited to the issue of whether Defendant Epstein's defense of the civil actions filed against him

of Breach USAO No. 2006R0 181 June 9, 2009 To Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney Robert

TATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: Dated: Dated: Dated: A. MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSTEIN RALD LEFCO r RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFR Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011815 EFTA00192861 By signing this Addendum, Epstein assert

aintiff." (Id. at 20.) Epstein quotes from the state plea colloquy and the state charging instrument to show that the state charges do not relate to Janc Doc #101. Further, he writes, "even if Defendant's state-law pleas did involve state-law offenses against Plaintiff—which they did not—§ 2255 only auth

tion who is hereby submitting this written request for documentary and tangible evidence relating to the U.S. Government's investigation concerning Jeffrey E. Epstein's repeated acts of sexual abuse against our client, Jane Doe.' See United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). We believe that such ev

rs of sexual abuse and exploitatiorS notorious pedophile and convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein. It all started in= when 3-year-old Doe met Epstein at a summer camp in Michigan. Doe was Epstein's first known victim and was ' To protect her anonymity, our client has elected to file her action as

o the U.S. Government's investigation concerning Jeffrey E. Epstein's repeated acts of sexual abuse against

o the U.S. Government's investigation concerning Jeffrey E. Epstein's repeated acts of sexual abuse against

t a summer camp in Michigan. Doe was Epstein's first known victim and was ' To protect her anonymity, our client has elected to file her action as a Janc Doc and will be referred to simply as "Doe" in this letter. The prosecutors handling the Epstein case and any and all related ongoing investigations in

f his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, I will address facts related to C.W., T.M., and S.R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. 'Please note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to C.W. and T.

ney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("the Office") entered into negotiations to resolve the investigation. At that

States Attorney assigned to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. The case was investigated by the Federal

f the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern

United States of America Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 724403, filed by Jane Doe.(rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 2 CERTIFICATE OF EMERGENCY by Janc Doc red Complaint (rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 1 ORDER requiring U.S. Attorney to respond to_l. Complaint filed by Jane Doc by 5:00 p.m. on

ravel to 358 El Brillo Way so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. Manner and Means 27. The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought to accomplish the purpose and

EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or about March 11, 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN reviewed a written telephone message prepared by one of his employees regard

was then a fifteen-year-old girl, and Jane Doc #7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom. (47) On or about July 4, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (48) On or about July 5,

#11, who was then a sixteen- year-old girl. (99) In or around the second half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN digitally penetrated the vagina of Janc Doc #11, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. (100) On or about August 6, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Janc Doe #11