Epstein Secrets

008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8

e all similarly structured and assert the same claims. In the section entitled "Factual Allegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages". (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. '111 10-11; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Comp.1 10-11; Jane

llegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mans

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

federal statutory claim "as she would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and 7 EFTA00221185 C

Circuit have held that Twomblv did not alter the standard for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) in the typical case. See, e.g., CBT Flint Partners. LLC Goodmail Systems, Inc. 529 F.Supp. 2d 1376, 1379 (N.D. Ga. 2007); Coughlin'. Wal-Mart Stores East LP 2008 WL 2704381 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Capaz Whitaker. Weinstraub &

008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8

e all similarly structured and assert the same claims. In the section entitled "Factual Allegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages". (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. '111 10-11; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Comp.1 10-11; Jane

llegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mans

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

federal statutory claim "as she would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and 7 EFTA00222011 C

Circuit have held that Twomblv did not alter the standard for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) in the typical case. See, e.g., CBT Flint Partners. LLC Goodmail Systems, Inc. 529 F.Supp. 2d 1376, 1379 (N.D. Ga. 2007); Coughlin'. Wal-Mart Stores East LP 2008 WL 2704381 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Capaz Whitaker. Weinstraub &

008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8

e all similarly structured and assert the same claims. In the section entitled "Factual Allegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages". (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. '111 10-11; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Comp.1 10-11; Jane

llegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mans

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

federal statutory claim "as she would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and 7 EFTA00222472 C

Circuit have held that Twomblv did not alter the standard for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) in the typical case. See, e.g., CBT Flint Partners. LLC Goodmail Systems, Inc. 529 F.Supp. 2d 1376, 1379 (N.D. Ga. 2007); Coughlin'. Wal-Mart Stores East LP 2008 WL 2704381 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Capaz Whitaker. Weinstraub &