Epstein Secrets

008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8

e all similarly structured and assert the same claims. In the section entitled "Factual Allegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages". (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. '111 10-11; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Comp.1 10-11; Jane

llegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mans

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

federal statutory claim "as she would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and 7 EFTA00221185 C

in Counts I and III. According to Defendant, the pleadings in this case do not satisfy "the standard of pleading" established in Bell Atlantic Corp. I. Twombly 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007). In making this argument, Defendant would extend Twomblv well beyond its intended scope. Twombly was an antitrust conspiracy cas

008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8

e all similarly structured and assert the same claims. In the section entitled "Factual Allegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages". (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. '111 10-11; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Comp.1 10-11; Jane

llegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mans

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

federal statutory claim "as she would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and 7 EFTA00222011 C

in Counts I and III. According to Defendant, the pleadings in this case do not satisfy "the standard of pleading" established in Bell Atlantic Corp. I. Twombly 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007). In making this argument, Defendant would extend Twomblv well beyond its intended scope. Twombly was an antitrust conspiracy cas

008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8

e all similarly structured and assert the same claims. In the section entitled "Factual Allegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages". (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. '111 10-11; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Comp.1 10-11; Jane

llegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mans

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.:

federal statutory claim "as she would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and 7 EFTA00222472 C

in Counts I and III. According to Defendant, the pleadings in this case do not satisfy "the standard of pleading" established in Bell Atlantic Corp. I. Twombly 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007). In making this argument, Defendant would extend Twomblv well beyond its intended scope. Twombly was an antitrust conspiracy cas

- flsd ( Page 1 of 14 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Doe No. 5'. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Member case: (View Member Case] Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Cause: 28:1332 Diversit

eth A. Marra on 5/20/2009. (1c3) (Entered: 05/20/2009) 05/20/2009 9B NOTICE by of Filing Withdrawal of Previously RaisedObjections to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to ConaitAnd/Or Identify . in the Style of This Case and Motion to IdentlfrM. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Alter

4/17/2008) 05/22/2008 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe No. 5. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/29/2008 5 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doe No. 5. (Attachments: # I Exhibi

5 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S S

of her claims. Supporting Memorandum of Law Standard on Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss As established by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. I. Twombly 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007), a motion to dismiss should be granted if the plaintiff does not plead "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible