Epstein Secrets

, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: (COLBATH) TO STAY DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 74 I MOT - MOTION Filing Date: 06-JUL-2009 Filing Party: JEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: NONPARTY E.W.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS FILED BY W. BERGER 75 RESP - RESPONSE TO: Fil

-MAR-2008 Filing Party: Disposition Amount: Docket Text: J FILED BY J. GOLDBERGER. ...... iim 41 NOTD - NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Filing Date: 24-MAR-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: FILED BY J. GOLDBERGER. 41 A NOTD - NOTICE OF TAKIN

27-2008 FRI 03:33 PH FAX NO. 5618358691 P. 02 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty 2 Case No. Charoe Count Lesser Decree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring P

ESS AVENUrn JAKE WORTH J. 334.61, Page 2 of 8 Form Reviled 03.18-08 EFTA00233561 11/25/2008 1572a . 3tit. ustetiu i isit.thisto r,:uc o6r uo MOREY EPSTEIN CASEa5020DBCFD09381AXparta SPECIAL gown-loss 1. You mutt undersea Dmg sod Alcohol evaluation end, if treatment Is dawned necessary, you must succe

ructed by: Supervising Officer up/07.02.08 Defendant Page 7 of 8 ForteReviled 03.18-08 EFTA00233566 11/‘'D/ZOOO 10:10 . • $ .140 War VW JEFFREY EPSTERI CASE0502008CF009381AXXX.MB COURT ORDERED PAYMENTS ' .. CRICK ALL THAT ARE ORDERED: FINES S_ Total of fine sunned In sentence, penmen to s. 775.

minal case. There are civil cases pending against Mr. Epstein. 7. CURRENT AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT:

ORDER Filing Date: 30-JUN-2008 Filing Party: EPSTEIN JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: none. 51 D

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty 2 Case No. Charoe Count

erly administration of justice" and "protect a compelling government interest." Oh, and third parties might get hurt. The compel- ling interest is Epsteinh, and there is no privacy issue since the victims themselves are making the request Palm • Beach police spent 11 months investigating Epstein, onl

of the New York Times Co.'. Holtzendorf, 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune I State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) 2 Sentinel Communications Co. I Watson, 615 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) 9 Wallace I. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) 21 ii EFTA00233611 Other Authorities F

I R, 2008 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Marie: Fauzintikt: I write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecut

lete any of the names on the list provided to Mi..Epstein's counsel, you do not confirm that the prior list

4 15:19 11:19,24 1:17 2:10,11 moment 13:24 hur 3:10 Jack 2:13 Lauderdale 15:16 months H Hefei° 4:24 2:2 4:5 2:14,21 13:20,21 10:10 Jeffrey leave morning I half 1.11,17 3:4 8:14 3:20,21 idea 13:20 14:21 4:6 let's motion handed 5:16 JR 8:6 11:11 4:7 6:2 7:6 5:13 9:1 imme

no.* CRDCOAL STATE or FLORIDA, Plaintiff, vs. JE/OVEY Eft:EYE, Defendant. rrocuormos NEW BEFORE

greement, which resulted in state charges against Mr. Epstein. has caused several miscommunications with respe

re public events, re- cords of court proceedings are public records, and there is a strong presumption in favor of public ac- cess to such matters." Sentinel Communications Co. I. Watson, 615 So.2d 768, 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (citing Barron'. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Mc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988)). This presumption r

ant to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where

s has a new admirer. Spencer Kuvin, a Florida lawyer who has (ought several cases for young women alleging sexual abuse by the disgraced billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, is delighted — and relieved — that newspapers are now examining Prince mew's relationship with the convicted paedophile. "lam glad the British pre

very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." 2. "We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children inside and outside

with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." 2. "We want to obtain additional deta

in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on communications between the media and lawyers and/or lit

attached), you are quoted as making the following statements: 1. "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." 2. "We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where, how frequently and the ex

very keen to speak with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." 2. "We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where, how frequently and the extent to which it involved the transport of children inside and outside t

with Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein." 2. "We want to obtain additional deta

ant to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where,

in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on communications between the media and lawyers and/or liti

Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331585 EFTA_OO2O43 I I EFTA02729297 • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., and B.B., Respondents. Pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and f

of two orders unsealing a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum (collectively the "NPA"), which are records of the trial court below. State v. Epstein, Case Nos. 06 CF9454AMB, 08 CF9381AMB. Petitioner was investigated by the State of Florida for felony solicitation of children for prostitution. (

FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PAL

rd parties" and identifies those third parties as Mr. Epstein's co- conspirators. (Petition at 15). Again, Mr.

tration 2.420 954 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2007) 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune v. State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) 2 Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) 9 Wallacos—augman, 687 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) 21 ii 09/12/2019 Page 3189 Agency to Agen

f his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, I will address facts related to C.W., T.M., and S.R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. 'Please note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to C.W. and T.

tates receives a Freedom of Information Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein before making that disclosure. (NPA, paragraph 13(emphasis added.) The first sentence of the above quote does no more than state an expectation b

8:4 15:19 11:19,24 1:17 2:10,11 moment 13:24 3:10 2:13 15:16 hur Jack Lauderdale months Hafele 4:24 2:2 4:5 2:14,21 13:20,21 10:10 Jeffrey leave morning I half 1.11,17 3:4 8:14 3:20,21 idea 13:20 14:21 4:6 let's motion handed 5:16 JA 8:6 11:11 4:7 6:2 7:6 5:13 9:1 imme

have signed off and said they will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the Southern District of Florida for any offe

re public events, re- cords of court proceedings are public records, and there is a strong presumption in favor of public ac- cess to such matters." Sentinel Communications Co. I Watson, 615 So.2d 768, 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (citing Barron I Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988)). This presumption r