Epstein Secrets

on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffity Epstein. After consideration of the Motion and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petitioners' Motion is GRANTED and the Non- Prosecution Agree

r attorneys shall not disclose the Agreement or its terms to any third party absent further court order, following notice to and an opportunity for Epstein's counsel to be heard." (DE 26 at 1.) Presumably, petitioners' motion to unseal is an effort to modify the terms of the Protective Order, to enable

CYCLED PAPER TO RWRDER CALL CO EFTA00232388 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty X Case No. Charge Count Lesser Degree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring P

urt at the time of Itits pie Sreg at DOM Dana PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLO1MNG IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epsteki Plea: Guilty Case No. ___Qtarge Count Leer Pears 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostftubon 1 No 3 FEL OSCFO09361AMB Procuring P

1. STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff Ns- IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND pop, PALM BEACH COUNTY CABENUMBER 302083CFV2,9231AXXXINIE JEFFREY E. InT2in . DIVISION >WORLEY "w'' Defendant DC NUMBBR 2/25,4. - - . ... CIRCUIT NUIvIEER1 If-A/JAM SPLIT ORDER OP COMMUNITY CONTROL I This

orida 3340L Lanna Belohlavek. Esq. Assistant State Attorney I interoffice) EFTA00232410 ' • - 2 EFTA00232411 ( • STATE OF FLORIDA, Vs. JEFFREY EPS'THENT, Defendant. / NONPARTY M'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER SEALING RECORDS AND UNSEAL RECORDS M., a nonparty, moves pursuant to the Rules of Judicial A

Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein is hereby ordered to be unsealed. DONE A

ed -- those • 5 are the maximums and minimums, Mr. Epstein. 6 What is proposed is that you will be 7 ple

, a.m. with appearances 8 as hereinbefore noted, to wit: 9 THEREUPON: 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Judge, 11 Jack Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey 12 Epstein. 13 THE COURT: Good morning. 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, we are 15 here for a plea conference. 16 THE COURT: Raise your right hand. 17 T

L IWN-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims'), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discuss

, a.m. with appearances 8 as hereinbefore noted, to wit: 9 THEREUPON: 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Judge, 11 Jack Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey 12 Epstein. 13 THE COURT: Good morning. 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, we are 15 here for a plea conference. 16 THE COURT: Raise your right hand. 17 T

on of their rights under the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. At the center of this action is an agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein that (as described in earlier court pleadings publicly filed by the Government) involved EFTA00231191 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered

ion of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") and Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). After consideration of the Motion, the arguments of the parties, and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petitioners' Motion is GRAN

endant_ Date of Plea Defendant EFTA00231269 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epsteki Pies: Guilty Cease No. Charge Count Lesnr Defile/ 06CF009454AM8 Felony Solicilataon of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring Pe

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty X Case No. Charge Count

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty X Case No. Charge Count

eed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been hied federally and convicted of an enum

L NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them front publicly disclosing or discus

Colbath Palm Beach County Courthouse Fifteenth Judicial Circuit 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 11F West Palm Beach, FL 33401 June 30, 2009 Re: Epstein v. State of Florida 15th Circuit Court Case No. 2008CF009381A Dear Judge Colbath: TELEPHONE (56 1) 659-6455 FACSIMILE (561) 820-8762 Enclosed is

Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) B.B's Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential. The only matter before the court today was Defendant Epstein's Motion for a Stay which the court denied.

ate referred to above. DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this SIGNED AND DATED day of June, 2009. 1 JUN 2 6 2009 JEFFREY liCOLBATH _COLSATH Circuit Court Judge EFTA00180625 Page Two Case No. 502008CF009381AXXMB/502006CF009454AXXMB Order Denying Motion to Stay Disc

tial. The only matter before the court today was Defendant Epstein's Motion for a Stay which the court denied. Cont

effrey Epstein Dear Judge Colbath: On behalf of Mr. Epstein, we strongly object to the proposed order submitt

, a.m. with appearances 8 as hereinbefore noted, to wit: 9 THEREUPON: 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Judge, 11 Jack Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey 12 Epstein. 13 THE COURT: Good morning. 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, we are 15 here for a plea conference. 16 THE COURT: Raise your right hand. 17 T

L NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discuss

ein will object to the unsealing of the agreement. Accordingly, the court should provide notice of this motion to Jeffrey Epstein, through counsel. Jeffrey Epstein's counsel has entered an appearance in several related civil suits, including Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern Dist

Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM _00332020 EFTA_00204746 EFTA02729730 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 2 of 8 Epstein's entry of guilty pleas to various state charges and an 18-month jail sentence, in exchange for which the U.S. Government apparently agreed to defer

tion is an agreement between the United Statesand Jeffrey Epstein that (as described in earlier court plea

eed wider Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enu

hereto (collectively referred to as the "Agreements), between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") and JeffreyEpstein ("Epstein'). At a hearing held on August 14,2008, the Court ordered the USAir./ to produce the Agreement to counsel for the Petitioners and to any o

L NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discuss

It has utterly failed to even offer any such cause — much less show that it is good cause. Second, the Government — with the apparent contrivance of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys — has made inaccurate representations about the nature of the non-prosecution agreement in its notices to the victims and in its filing b

well as to the Court — lies with Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys'. See Gov't Response at 5 ("the [inaccurate] victim notification letter was provided to Epstein's attorneys prior to being sent, who approved the language of which the petitioners now complain."). The apparent approval by Jeffrey Epstein's at

-2006 Amendments version of the law applies. See Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, for More Definite Statement

he terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffre

made a part of the record and the extent to which Mr. Epstein, through his attorneys, was culpable. Sincerely

L NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. 'The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discus

It has utterly failed to even offer any such cause — much less show that it is good cause. Second, the Government — with the apparent contrivance of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys — has made inaccurate representations about the nature of the non-prosecution agreement in its notices to the victims and in its filing b

well as to the Court — lies with Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys'. See Gov't Response at 5 ("the [inaccurate] victim notification letter was provided to Epstein's attorneys prior to being sent, who approved the language of which the petitioners now complain."). The apparent approval by Jeffrey Epstein's at

he terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffre

L NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discuss

It has utterly failed to even offer any such cause — much less show that it is good cause. Second, the Government — with the apparent contrivance of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys — has made inaccurate representations about the nature of the non-prosecution agreement in its notices to the victims and in its filing b

well as to the Court — lies with Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys'. See Gov't Response at 5 ("the [inaccurate] victim notification letter was provided to Epstein's attorneys prior to being sent, who approved the language of which the petitioners now complain."). The apparent approval by Jeffrey Epstein's at

he terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffre

L NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discuss

It has utterly failed to even offer any such cause — much less show that it is good cause. Second, the Government — with the apparent contrivance of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys — has made inaccurate representations about the nature of the non-prosecution agreement in its notices to the victims and in its filing b

well as to the Court — lies with Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys'. See Gov't Response at 5 ("the [inaccurate] victim notification letter was provided to Epstein's attorneys prior to being sent, who approved the language of which the petitioners now complain."). The apparent approval by Jeffrey Epstein's at

he terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffre

L NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COME NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and reply to the Government's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement. The victims have moved for a lifting of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discuss