Epstein Secrets

on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffity Epstein. After consideration of the Motion and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petitioners' Motion is GRANTED and the Non- Prosecution Agree

r attorneys shall not disclose the Agreement or its terms to any third party absent further court order, following notice to and an opportunity for Epstein's counsel to be heard." (DE 26 at 1.) Presumably, petitioners' motion to unseal is an effort to modify the terms of the Protective Order, to enable

CYCLED PAPER TO RWRDER CALL CO EFTA00232388 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty X Case No. Charge Count Lesser Degree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring P

urt at the time of Itits pie Sreg at DOM Dana PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLO1MNG IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epsteki Plea: Guilty Case No. ___Qtarge Count Leer Pears 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostftubon 1 No 3 FEL OSCFO09361AMB Procuring P

1. STATE OF FLORIDA Plaintiff Ns- IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND pop, PALM BEACH COUNTY CABENUMBER 302083CFV2,9231AXXXINIE JEFFREY E. InT2in . DIVISION >WORLEY "w'' Defendant DC NUMBBR 2/25,4. - - . ... CIRCUIT NUIvIEER1 If-A/JAM SPLIT ORDER OP COMMUNITY CONTROL I This

orida 3340L Lanna Belohlavek. Esq. Assistant State Attorney I interoffice) EFTA00232410 ' • - 2 EFTA00232411 ( • STATE OF FLORIDA, Vs. JEFFREY EPS'THENT, Defendant. / NONPARTY M'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER SEALING RECORDS AND UNSEAL RECORDS M., a nonparty, moves pursuant to the Rules of Judicial A

Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein is hereby ordered to be unsealed. DONE A

ed -- those • 5 are the maximums and minimums, Mr. Epstein. 6 What is proposed is that you will be 7 ple

, a.m. with appearances 8 as hereinbefore noted, to wit: 9 THEREUPON: 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Judge, 11 Jack Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey 12 Epstein. 13 THE COURT: Good morning. 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, we are 15 here for a plea conference. 16 THE COURT: Raise your right hand. 17 T

(2) a causal connection between the injury and the causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11th Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim

Colbath Palm Beach County Courthouse Fifteenth Judicial Circuit 205 North Dixie Highway, Room 11F West Palm Beach, FL 33401 June 30, 2009 Re: Epstein v. State of Florida 15th Circuit Court Case No. 2008CF009381A Dear Judge Colbath: TELEPHONE (56 1) 659-6455 FACSIMILE (561) 820-8762 Enclosed is

Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) B.B's Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential. The only matter before the court today was Defendant Epstein's Motion for a Stay which the court denied.

ate referred to above. DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this SIGNED AND DATED day of June, 2009. 1 JUN 2 6 2009 JEFFREY liCOLBATH _COLSATH Circuit Court Judge EFTA00180625 Page Two Case No. 502008CF009381AXXMB/502006CF009454AXXMB Order Denying Motion to Stay Disc

tial. The only matter before the court today was Defendant Epstein's Motion for a Stay which the court denied. Cont

effrey Epstein Dear Judge Colbath: On behalf of Mr. Epstein, we strongly object to the proposed order submitt

, a.m. with appearances 8 as hereinbefore noted, to wit: 9 THEREUPON: 10 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Judge, 11 Jack Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey 12 Epstein. 13 THE COURT: Good morning. 14 MR. GOLDBERGER: Your Honor, we are 15 here for a plea conference. 16 THE COURT: Raise your right hand. 17 T

(2) a causal connection between the injury and the causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc.,. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11th Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim a

s an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing

r attorneys shall not disclose the Agreement or its terms to any third party absent further court order, following notice to and an opportunity for Epstein's counsel to be heard." (DE 26 at 1.) Presumably, petitioners' motion to unseal is an effort to modify the terms of the Protective Order, to enable

between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by th

(2) a causal connection between the injury and the causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11'h Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim

s an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing

r attorneys shall not disclose the Agreement or its terms to any third party absent further court order, following notice to and an opportunity for Epstein's counsel to be heard." (DE 26 at 1.) Presumably, petitioners' motion to unseal is an effort to modify the terms of the Protective Order, to enable

between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by th

(2) a causal connection between the injury and the causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11'h Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim

s an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing

r attorneys shall not disclose the Agreement or its terms to any third party absent further court order, following notice to and an opportunity for Epstein's counsel to be heard." (DE 26 at 1.) Presumably, petitioners' motion to unseal is an effort to modify the terms of the Protective Order, to enable

between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by th

(2) a causal connection between the injury and the causal conduct; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater, Fla., 351 F.3d 1112, 1116 (11th Cir. 2003). Petitioners already have obtained access to the agreement, so they cannot claim