Epstein Secrets

FREY EPSTEIN RALD LUC° RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFR Y EPSTEIN , ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 0

15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in viol

means of interstate commerce We ask that you consider the most relevant highlights front her testimony offered below: • Consent A: I said. I told Jeffrey, I heard you like massages topless. And he's like. yeah, he said, hut you don't have to do anything that you don't feel comlbrutble with. And I sai

5, 2007. I want to make clear at the outset that Mr. Epstein is complying fully with the Non Prosecution Agree

d the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013396 EFTA00230301 Terms of the Agreement: I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nolo contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach Coun

that neutrality to create a false impression that we do not believe in the validity of the victims' claims. 2You may want to review United States'. Crompton Corp., 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (ND. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding victim notification and other issues. Some of these issues also are add

r 27, 2007. That tone was engendered by the roadblocks that you continue to erect as we try to perform our contractual obligations coupled with Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. This letter sets forth the last opportunity for your client and his entire defense team to conform unwaveringly to all of the term

t 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: I write in response to your r

perform our contractual obligations coupled with Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. This letter sets forth the last

statute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. nYou may want to review United States. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding victim notification and other issues. Some of these issues also are add

r 27, 2007. That tone was engendered by the roadblocks that you continue to erect as we try to perform our contractual obligations coupled with Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. This letter sets forth the last opportunity for your client and his entire defense team to conform unwaveringly to all of the term

t 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: I write in response to your r

perform our contractual obligations coupled with Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. This letter sets forth the last

atute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. nYou may want to review United States v. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea

ida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 99 N.E. '0 Street Miami. FL 33132-2111 Facsimile: November 30, 2007 I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding

ber 15th, Rolando Garcia met with Barry Krisher on another matter, and was told by Mr. Krisher that he had just spoken with Jack Goldberger, and Mr. Epstein's plea and sentencing were set to occur on December 14, 2007. Since that time, we have tried to confirm the date and time of the hearing, to includ

53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 99 N.E. '0 Street Miami. FL

that he had just spoken with Jack Goldberger, and Mr. Epstein's plea and sentencing were set to occur on Decem

eld and a sword? Thus, while we will not involve ourselves in the civil litigation, we will not allow you to 2You may want to review United States. Crompton Corp., 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his EFTA00221297 JAY P. LEF

2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: I write in response to your recent e-mails and letters regarding victim notification and other issues. Some of these issues also are add

r 27, 2007. That tone was engendered by the roadblocks that you continue to erect as we try to perform our contractual obligations coupled with Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. This letter and U.S. Attorney Acosta's letter set forth the last opportunity for your client and his entire defense team to confor

t 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: I write in response to your r

perform our contractual obligations coupled with Mr. Epstein's nonperformance. This letter and U.S. Attorney

statute, your statement that our notification must be limited only to the right to restitution is incorrect. You may want to review United States. Crompton Corp. , 399 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Cal. 2005), where the district court would not allow an unindicted co-conspirator to have his name redacted from a plea