Epstein Secrets

/2013 Page 19 of 23 Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Box #3 P-011923 Thru P-011966 Folder entitled "Responses to Arguments from JE Counsel" containing: II 7/13/2007 letter from Lilly Ann Sanchez to with handwritten attorney notes; • 6/25/2007 letter from Gerald Lefcourt t

ml 6/25/2007 email from to and entitled "Thoughts on Lefcourt's letter" Handwritten and typed attorney ( ) notes regarding main themes raised by Epstein counsel Work product Deliberative process 6(e) Attorney-Client Privilege Box #3 P-011967 Thru P-012016 Composition book entitled "Operation

y and privacy."2 The undisputed evidence begins in 2005, when the Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD") had identified numerous girls as victims of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual crimes. In 2006, the PBPD turned the case over to federal authorities for further investigation. As early as March 15, 2007 and throughout t

e victims. The letter also falsely claimed that "Mr. Epstein never targeted minors," and urged the Government

tion Box #3 P-012017 Thru P-012055 Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Sub

ains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation regarding Lefkowitz email about lawsuit filed against Epstem by one of the victims identified during the state investigation. Page 12 of 18 EFTA00185441 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329-1 Entered on FLS

-015028 7/8/2008 email from . to A. Acosta, and Work Product Deliberative Process regarding victim notification letter provided to counsel for J. Epstein on 11/28/2007 with attachment (NB: The 11/28/2007 email to J. Leflcowitz with attachment will be produced to petitioners' counsel contemporaneously

nd • roblems with victims bein harassed P-014830 thru P-014837 4/2/2008 emails between Alex Acosta, and regarding efforts by Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Stan.. with Alex Acosta and instructions to direct • uestion to and Deliberative Process Work Product Attorney-Client Privilege Page 16 of 18 EFTA0

at there were numerous oral and written communications between others at the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Justice Department with counsel for Mr. Epstein. While in some cases I was told of the communications or cc'ed on emails or letters summarizing the communications, for many conversations, meetings

stein would be pleading guilty on June 30, 2008, I would not release the witness (id.). I formally withdrew the subpoena on June 30, 2008, following Jeffrey Epstein's entry of his guilty plea in state court (Exhibit B-135). These activities took us up to the time of Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea. Fro

to Ms. regarding that plea offer. Mr. left the U.S. Attorney's Office on that date to become partner at Kobre & Kim in New York. First Assistant Jeffrey (now in private practice): FAUSA (later U.S. Attorney was involved in telephone calls and meetings with counsel for Mr. Epstein; when Epstein's

fice and the Justice Department with counsel for Mr. Epstein. While in some cases I was told of the communicat

n's counsel on July 31, 2007 (Exhibit 38). The issue must have been raised in advance of the meeting, because that was the first meeting attended by Ken Stan, and.ifically thanked me for bringing§ 2255 to their attention. On August 2, 2007, Lilly sent I letter to Criminal Chief makin series of counte

To: From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Thur 7/12/2018 7:11:11 PM Subject: Re:

To: From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Thur 7/12/2018 7:11:11 PM Subject: Re: S

bject: Re: Soon Vi 645 On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:10 PM wrote: please see below from Soon Yi and advise: Is it possible to come at seven now that Ken Stan isn't coming or does Jeffrey have a plane to catch and we should still come at 6:30? please note The information contained in this communication i