Epstein Secrets

August 4, 2009 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Jeffrey Epstein/B.B. — Requested Disclosure of Non-Prosecution Agreement Dear Mr. Kuvin: Thank you for your letter regarding the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agree

ter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein's counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Dismiss was not a

's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 voswidrkland.com June 15, 2009 Re: Jay Epstein Dear a I am attaching a letter authored by my co-counsel, Robert Critton, on today's date. It represents our agreement with a proposal that Kathy Ez

Atkinson, Esq. EFTA00183762 J. WHAM. BURMAN, PA., GREGORY W.CCU:NAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON. IR., PA., BERNARD LEBEDBKER MARK T. I II/STIER, PA. JEFFREY PEPIN MIOIAEL PIKE HEATHER McNAMARA RUDA I R.ORIDA WARD anima CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNER

8 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defend

, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. www.kirklend.com June 12, 200

d therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement

ssues Mr. Epstein, through counsel, has fully remedied any perceived breach. Please advise if you for any reason disagree. Respectfully submitted, Jay P. Le owifr, Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, EFTA00183752 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP . N.sq. Esq. EFTA0018375

August 4, 2009 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Jeffrey Epstein/B.B. — Requested Disclosure of Non-Prosecution Agreement Dear Mr. Kuvin: Thank you for your letter regarding the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agree

ter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein's counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Dismiss was not a

tatement [DE 29] dated May 26, 2009. Counsel for Defendant EPSTEIN Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a

, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana, M www.kirkland.com

d therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement

tion against Jeffrey Epstein styled B.B.I. Jeffi-ey Epstein, case no.: 502008CA037319 MB AB. We are hereby r

ssues Mr. Epstein, through counsel, has fully remedied any perceived breach. Please advise if you for any reason disagree. Respectfully submitted, Jay P. Le owiiz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA00194706 KIIUCLAND & ELLIS LLP CC: Jeffrey Slo

ict Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorneys Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYS1D # OS1909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to

ieve expose the stark contrast between the inflammatory, speculative case summary presented by the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning the alleged conduct for which New York seeks to require Mr. Epstein to register under SORA. We beli

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYS1D # OS1909, Supreme Court Case # 3

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYS1D # OS1909, Supreme Court Case # 30

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

d to speaking with you about this matter and your position on the SORA hearing in advance of our scheduled court date on November 9th. Sincerely, Jay P. Le t r 'tz, P.0 Sandra Lynn Musumeci IPL/slm Attachments EFTA00312755 EXHIBIT A EFTA00312756 Page 1 In 8I: I bityrAPED 1 WE RV1Rit O1 Sandy

4611 Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear www.lorklancl.com June 12, 2009 Facsimile: I am in possession of your June 12, 2009 letter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit

ter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein's counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Dicmiks was not a

, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear www.lorklancl.com June 12, 2009

d therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement

ssues Mr. Epstein, through counsel, has fully remedied any perceived breach. Please advise if you for any reason disagree. Respectfully submitted, Jay P. Le owilz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA00190139 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP CC: Jeffrey Slom

outhern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 www.lorklancl.com June 12, 2009 Facsimile: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. I am in possession of your June 12, 2009 letter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referen

ter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein's counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Divniks was not a

ww.lorklancl.com June 12, 2009 Facsimile: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. I am in possession of your Jun

d therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement

ssues Mr. Epstein, through counsel, has fully remedied any perceived breach. Please advise if you for any reason disagree. Respectfully submitted, Jay P. Le owliz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA00212859 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP CC: Esq. Esq.

10022.4611 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear www.lorklancl.com June 12, 2009 Facsimile: I am in possession of your June 12, 2009 letter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit

ter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein's counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Dicirliks was not

, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear www.lorklancl.com June 12, 2009

d therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein's obligations under the non-prosecution agreement

ssues Mr. Epstein, through counsel, has fully remedied any perceived breach. Please advise if you for any reason disagree. Respectfully submitted, Jay P. Le owilz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA00214107 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP CC: Jeffrey Slom

iv EFTA00792573 INTRODUCTION In a stunning reversal of the position they espoused on the record at the SORA hearing, the People oppose Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein's appeal of the Order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designati

YWELL Notary Public State of New York No Qualified in Kings County Commission Expires November 15. 2012 /s/ Howard Daniels Case Name: People v. Epstein EFTA00792607

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REP

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. REPL

tion, should be vacated, and Appellant's SORA level should be recalculated in accordance with the law. September 16, 2011 Respectfully submitted, Jay P. Le owitz. P Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446