Epstein Secrets

ITIONERS ARE EQUITABLY ESTOPPED FROM CHALLENGING THE NPA On September 10, 2008, Jane Doe No. 1 filed an action in Palm Beach County, Florida, E.W. I. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXXMB, seeking money damages from Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing her. Ex. P. On September 11, 2008, Jane Doe No.

r than to assert that Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused both. However, the differing circumstances of the two petitioners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 r

0. When asked whether Epstein "pulled you closer to him in a sexual way," Jane Doe No. 2 replied: A. I wish. No, no, never, ever, ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome man, no. Id. at 22. At the end of her interview, Jane Doe No. 2 was asked if she had any questions for the agents or AUSA Id. at 57

agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion." Ex. N, Nov. 27, 2007 email

o Gonzales issued the "Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance." Ex. M. Article II.D provides definitions of "crime victim": I. Enforcement of Rights. For purposes of enforcing the rights enumerated in article I.B, a victim is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commissio

plaint, she alleged in part: 20. The Plaintiff is included in the list of victims identified by the Federal Government as victims of the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's illegal conduct. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is thus estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal Government from denying the acts alle

006 to 2008, when the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida investigated Jeffrey Epstein, no criminal charge was filed against Epstein in Federal district court. Ex. S, ¶ 4. Although the U.S. Attorney's Office opened a matter to conduct an investigation of Epstein and to evaluate a

0. When asked whether Epstein "pulled you closer to him in a sexual way," Jane Doe No. 2 replied: A. I wish. No, no, never, ever, ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome man, no. Id. at 22. At the end of her interview, Jane Doe No. 2 was asked if she had any questions for the agents or AUSA Id. at 57

ounty, Florida, seeking money damages from Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing her. Ex. P. 9. On September II, 2008, Jane Doe No. 2 file an action t.y Epstein, Case in Palm Beach County, Florida, seeking money damages 2 EFTA00211708 from Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing her. Ex. Q. 10. In Jane Doe

greement was negotiated in 2007-2008, these Guidelines were in effect. 6. Article II(D) of the Guidelines provides a definition of "crime victim." I. Enforcement of Rights. For purposes of enforcing the rights enumerated in article I.B, a victim is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commissio

al charge in a criminal complaint or an information, and no case was ever filed. Id. 8. On September 10, 2008, Jane Doe No. 1 filed an action (E.W. I. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXXMB) in Palm Beach County, Florida, seeking money damages from Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing her. Ex. P. 9.

006 to 2008, when the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida investigated Jeffrey Epstein, no criminal charge was filed against Epstein in Federal district court. Ex. S, ¶ 4. Although the U.S. Attorney's Office opened a matter to conduct an investigation of Epstein and to evaluate a

0. When asked whether Epstein "pulled you closer to him in a sexual way," Jane Doe No. 2 replied: A. I wish. No, no, never, ever, ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome man, no. Id. at 22. At the end of her interview, Jane Doe No. 2 was asked if she had any questions for the agents or AUSA Id. at 57

greement was negotiated in 2007-2008, these Guidelines were in effect. 6. Article II(D) of the Guidelines provides a definition of "crime victim." I. Enforcement of Rights. For purposes of enforcing the rights enumerated in article I.B, a victim is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commissio

charge in a criminal complaint or an information, and no case was ever filed. Id. 8. On September 10, 2008, Jane Doe No. 1 filed an action (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 50-2008-CA-028058-XXXXMB) in Palm Beach County, Florida, seeking money damages from Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing her. Ex. P. 9. On Sep

006 to 2008, when the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida investigated Jeffrey Epstein, no criminal charge was filed against Epstein in Federal district court. Ex. S,914. Although the U.S. Attorney's Office opened a matter to conduct an investigation of Epstein and to evaluate a

0. When asked whether Epstein "pulled you closer to him in a sexual way," Jane Doe No. 2 replied: A. I wish. No, no, never, ever, ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome man, no. Id. at 22. At the end of her interview, Jane Doe No. 2 was asked if she had any questions for the agents or AUSA Villafafia

greement was negotiated in 2007-2008, these Guidelines were in effect. 6. Article II(D) of the Guidelines provides a definition of "crime victim." I. Enforcement of Rights. For purposes of enforcing the rights enumerated in article 1.B, a victim is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commissio