Epstein Secrets

esses and register himself as an agent. I also observed Epstein has his El Zorro Ranch Corporation, New York Strategy Group, Ghislaine Corporation, J Epstein and Company and the Financial Strategy Group registered to this same address. Finally, a third call is received bye at 12:02 pm from the same cor

ruck. I transported the trash bags to the sanitation department, where I sifted through its contents. I collected mail correspondences addressed to Jeffrey Epstein as well as notepaper (Important Message) with names and telephone numbers. The following are items collected from Epstein s trash. Joanne G. (714-

ash bags to the sanitation department were I sifted through its contents. I collected mail correspondence from Armani Exchange addressed to Nada , Jeffrey E. Epstein notepaper with' lla an important message notepaper addressed to J,E dated 03/29/05 at 8:15 p.m. reference Peggy Seagal, U.S Airways boarding pas

ndence from Armani Exchange addressed to Nada , Jeffrey E. Epstein notepaper with' lla an important mess

Epstein is to return for arraignment on August 25, 2006 at 8:45 am. ATT POLICE CLERKS: Please show this case cleared by arrest with the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein W/M 01-20-1953. ** End of Report ** EFTA00184554 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-35 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 35 E

ndence from Armani Exchange addressed to Nada , Jeffrey E. Epstein notepaper with' lla an important messa

New York. Mr. Zeff stated he is the designer for Mr. Epstein's homes. He advised he was contacted in March of

EFTA00184589 'Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-39 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 6 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief Child Exploitation ad (Amery Section Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53n0 St. New York, NY 10022-4611

hom it Miy Concern: We write on behalf of our client,ltfaSt, to request certain records under the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act. Mr. Epstein has been the focus of a joint investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") and Federal Bureau of Invest

Nvei 'fork San Francisco WashIng:on, D.C. EFTA01718415 Dec-B7-117 finrfBna Fron-Fowler-White Burnett T-966 P.003/004 BiTe Affirmation I, Jeffrey E. Epstein do hereby re-affamt the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum w same dared October 30, 2007. Aq- EFTA01718416 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 XIRRLAND

e Burnett T-966 P.003/004 BiTe Affirmation I, Jeffrey E. Epstein do hereby re-affamt the Non-Prosecution

outset that o, iowever, want to a ress eac o e points you raise in your e er. New or -4611 www.ilitkland.com November 8, 2007 Facsimile: Re: Jetty Epstein Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington, D.C. EFTA01718432 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP oven •007 Page 2 EFTA017184

e Burnett T-966 P.003/004 BiTe Affirmation I, Jeffrey E. Epstein do hereby re-affamt the Non-Prosecution A

the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act. Mr. Epstein has been the focus of a joint investigation by th

: EFTA01718488 II EFTA01718489 05/16/008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 ...FRI 11:08 FAX IZ 002/006 O002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief Child Exploitation and Moronity Sea ion Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLF Citigroup Center 153 E. 531'3 St. New York, NY 10022-46

response (below). I know that you keep saying he is going to plead, and he will plead if we cave on everything, but I really do not think that Mr. Epstein is going to engage in serious negotiations until he sees the Indictment and shows up in mag court (preferably in flip- flops). In reviewing the indi

Twiller Smith, Victim Specialist, Federal Bureau of Investigation, West Palm Beach, Florida. Letter to Brad Edwards, Esq., dated July 9, 2008, RE: Jeffrey Epstein/C.W.: Notification of Identified Victim (2 pages); Author: A. Marie Villafana. Letter to Brad Edwards, Esq., dated July 9, 2008, RE: Jeffrey Epstein/S.R

E: Epstein (1 page) Letter to Jeffrey Sloman, dated December 7, 2007, RE: Jeffrey Epstein, Author: Lilly Ann Sanchez (1 page Affirmation signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1 page Notice of Hearing, and 1 page fax transmittal sheet, attached) E-mail, Marie Villafana to Jack Goldberger, dated June 28, 2008 11:31 a.m.,

Lilly Ann Sanchez (1 page Affirmation signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1 page Notice of Hearing, and 1 page f

Lilly Ann Sanchez (1 page Affirmation signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1 page Notice of Hearing, and 1 page fa

ve on everything, but I really do not think that Mr. Epstein is going to engage in serious negotiations until

08 9:45 p.m., RE: Fw: Epstein (2 pages) Letter to Jay Lefkowitz, Esq., dated May 15, 2008, RE: Investigation of Jeffery Epstein (5 pages), Author: Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief, Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice E-mail, Jay Lefkowitz to Alex Acosta, dated May 19,

were over 18, some were under, and the identity of a given masseuse on a given day depended entirely on who was available or who was brought to Mr. Epstein home, unsolicited, by a friend. There was, in short, no deliberate effort to target underage girls; to the extent any underage girls visited Mr. Ep

tirely on who was available or who was brought to Mr. Epstein home, unsolicited, by a friend. There was, in sh

hat each has brought a civil lawsuit against Mr. Epstein, with Ms. and her family seeking $50 million from Mr. Epstein, their testimony against Mr. Epstem is per se suspect. The lawyer representing the "victims" made a public statement conceding that they had lied about their ages and then dismissed t

ED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN This submission addresses (i) whether e

mes such that Federal jurisdiction is necessary."). EFTA00225908 • • • SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN This submission addresses (i) whether existing federal statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b), 1591 and 2423, apply to the conduct at issue; and (ii) wheth

ED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN This submission addresses (i) whether ex

ngeles. California 90017 To . www.kirkland.com March 28, 2008 BY HAND DELIVERY Honorable Sigal P. Mandelker Deputy Assistant Attorney General Andrew G. Oosterbaan Chief, Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section Criminal Division United States Department of Justice 1400 New York Avenue, 6th Floor Washington

, Jeffrey Epstein had been charged by the State of Florida with solicitation of prostitution, a violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.07. State of Florida'. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006-CF-009495AXXXMB (Palm Beach Cty, Fla.). In the summer of 2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office, seeking a

were gathered as part of the Grand Jury investigation. As the investigation progressed, Jane Doe 2's identity became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to

initiate an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein, and his personal assistants, had induced

retion should he authorize federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein." Epstein's attorneys then sought additional rev

vision. They met with the Chief and Deputy Chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and presented written arguments. On May 15, 2008, Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief, Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, sent a five-page letter 2 EFTA00211465 to Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, Esq., in which he

n and Obscenity Sectron Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53nd St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz: 1400 New Yes* Avenue, NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20530 (202) 514-5780 FAX: (202) 514-1793 May 15, 2008 Pursuant to your r

sta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict criminal enforcement policy interests. As part of our evaluation, we have reviewed letters written

ted certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prose

ein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict

U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief Child Exploitation and Obscenity Sectron Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53nd St. New York, NY 10022-46

nd Oknewilly Banton Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53s St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of/eery Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz: /400 New York Avessuct NW SLOG 600 2 LI : 30 F May 15,2008 Pursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. A

to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict criminal enforcement policy interests. As

ted certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prose

ein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict

IS SHEET: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: EFTA00214446 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX ql) 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief Child exptedinaun end Oknewilly Banton Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53s St. New York, NY 10022-4611

n and Obscenity Sectron Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53nd St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz: 1400 New Yes* Avenue, NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20530 (202) 514-5780 FAX: (202) 514-1793 May 15, 2008 Pursuant to your r

sta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict criminal enforcement policy interests. As part of our evaluation, we have reviewed letters written

ted certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prose

ein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict

U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief Child Exploitation and Obscenity Sectron Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53nd St. New York, NY 10022-46

ida DELIVERYIX FSCS2411.1j Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis UP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New Yodc, New York 10022,-4675 Re: Jeffrey lipstein Dear Jay: 99 N.G. 4th Soca Miami, FL 33132-V11 (305) 961.9299 Futuinurk: (305)530-6414 November 5.2007 Several things have come to my

nt has been breached; however, I have sufficient concerns that need to be addressed. First, T understand that private investigators working for Mr. Epstein have contacted victims to ask them whether any detectives or FBI agents have discussed a financial settlement with them. On one occasion, the priva

to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict criminal enforcement policy interests, As

understand that private investigators working for Mr. Epstein have contacted victims to ask them whether any d

INSTRUCTIONS: bq EFTA00289784 . 06/16/2008 11:16 FAX ' 06/16/08 FRI II:08 FAX Q002/006 ej002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief CUM aoloitenion and OfraunkySentan Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53111St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re