Epstein Secrets

Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 became familiar enough with the non-prosecution agreement to both invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.1 United States' Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject matter Jurisdiction, D.E. 205-6, Exhibits A -

wsuit was that the government failed to consult with them prior to what they believed would be the disposition of the federal investigation against Epstein. D.E. I II 3,4. They knew, at the time their petition was filed, that Epstein had "recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, i

h invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.1 United States'

refore cannot be within the statute. Holy Trinity Church'. United States 143 U.S. 457, 516-17 (1892). In Webb'. United States 21 CI.Ct. 137 (1990), the Court of Claims was presented with a claim for military back pay during the period December I, 1950 through February 1, 1954. Webb enlisted in the U.S. Army and wa

Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe No. 2 became familiar enough with the non-prosecution agreement to both invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.' United States' Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject matter Jurisdiction, D.E. 205-6, Exhibits A —

wsuit was that the government failed to consult with them prior to what they believed would be the disposition of the federal investigation against Epstein. D.E. 1,11 3,4. They knew, at the time their petition was filed, that Epstein had "recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, i

h invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.' United States'

re cannot be within the statute. Holy Trinity Church I. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 516-17 (1892). In Webb i. United States, 21 CI.Ct. 137 (1990), the Court of Claims was presented with a 17 EFTA00210613 claim for military back pay during the period December I, 1950 through February 1, 1954. Webb enlisted in t

Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 became familiar enough with the non-prosecution agreement to both invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.1 From its inception, the premise of their CVRA lawsuit was that the government failed I Jane Doe No. 3, who seeks to be add

d I Jane Doe No. 3, who seeks to be added as a party, also wasted little time in utilizing the non-prosecution agreement to seek money damages from Epstein. After receiving written notice in January 2009 from the U.S. Attorney's Office of Epstein's guilty pleas and the potential of obtaining compensatio

h invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.1 From its incept

re cannot be within the statute. Holy Trinity Church I. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 516-17 (1892). In Webb I. United States, 21 CI.Ct. 137 (1990), the Court of Claims was presented with a 16 EFTA00210635 claim for military back pay during the period December I, 1950 through February 1, 1954. Webb enlisted in t

Jeevacation Sent Fri 5/15/2009 6:18:30 PM Subject: Re: Landmark Great Sent from my iPhone On May IS, 2009, at 1:43 PM, "Gerald Barton" wrote: Jeffrey, Stephen Caplinger, who has long been our head landscape architect and land planner, and was also at New Albany for many years, will be emailing yo

se notify the sender immediately by either telephone or e-mail, and delete the original and any copies from your computer system. Thank you. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailtojeevacationeornaiLcoal Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 12:12 PM To: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: Landmark no„ he can go anytime and we can speak o

m your computer system. Thank you. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailtojeevacationeornaiLcoal Sent: Friday, May 1

131 million net value to the bank in 1982, and that the government, without cause, violated their contract, Landmark received only $21 million from the Court of Claims. By the time it paid its lawyers, court costs, and its debt of honor to directors, etc., it had approximately $4 million net remaining. In 2004 we

se notify the sender immediately by either telephone or e-mail, and delete the original and any copies from your computer system. Thank you. From: Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 12:12 PM To: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: Landmark no„ he can go anytime and we can speak

To: Jeffrey Epstei From: "Gi Feather' < Jeffrey, Sent Fri 5/15/2009 5:43:34 PM Subject: RE: Landmark > on behalf of "Gerald Barton" Stephen Caplinger, who has long been our head landscape arch

your computer system. Thank you. From: Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May

131 million net value to the bank in 1982, and that the government, without cause, violated their contract, Landmark received only $21 million from the Court of Claims. By the time it paid its lawyers, court costs, and its debt of honor to directors, etc., it had approximately $4 million net remaining. In 2004 we

se notify the sender immediately by either telephone or e-mail, and delete the original and any copies from your computer system. Thank you. From: Jeffrey Epstein [malitoueevacationOgmatcom] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:58 AM To: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: Landmark of course . rc expenses. and i will wait

rc expenses. and i will wait until i see you for barry, so that i might help sell the oil On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Gerald Barton < wrote: Jeffrey. Let me know when you would like him there and I will make it work. I owe you so much I hate to ask. but since you know how poor we are, you will u

To: Jeffrey Epstein .- - i•nri Scaagaaicamj_ From: "Gi Feather <

131 million net value to the bank in 1982, and that the government, without cause, violated their contract, Landmark received only $21 million from the Court of Claims. By the time it paid its lawyers, court costs, and its debt of honor to directors, etc., it had approximately $4 million net remaining. In 2004 we

se notify the sender immediately by either telephone or e-mail, and delete the original and any copies from your computer system. Thank you. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:19 AM To: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: Landmark i would like your land planner to go t

To: Jeffrey Epstei From: "Gi Feather' < Jeffrey, Sent Fri 5/15/2009 3:38:07 PM Subject: RE: Landmark on behalf of "Gerald Barton' Let me know when you would like him there and I will make it w

your computer system. Thank you. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May

131 million net value to the bank in 1982, and that the government, without cause, violated their contract, Landmark received only $21 million from the Court of Claims. By the time it paid its lawyers, court costs, and its debt of honor to directors, etc., it had approximately $4 million net remaining. In 2004 we

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 3:19 PM To: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: Landmark i would like your land planner to go to my

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, M

1 million net value to the bank in 1982, and that the government, without cause, violated=20 their contract, Landmark received only $21 million from the Court of Claims. By the time it paid its lawyers, court costs, and its debt of honor to directors, etc., it had approximately $4 million net remaining. In 2004 we

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 2:12 PM To: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: Landmark Did you loan come through ? any feedback f

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 2,

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday,

1 million net value to the bank in 1982, and that the government, without cause, violated=20 their contract, Landmark received only $21 million from the Court of Claims. By the time it paid its lawyers, court costs, and its debt of honor to directors, etc., it had approximately $4 million net remaining. In 2004 we

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 1:36 PM To: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: outline , yes i still own it but d= not use it very

o: Gerald Barton Subject: Re: outline , yes i still own it but d= not use it very much On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Gerald Barton < wrote: Jeffrey, In the early 90s, you show=d me enormous friendship and kindness. Since that time, I felt a deb= to you to somehow compensate for your deep consid

and kindness. Since that time, I felt a deb= to you to somehow compensate for your deep consideration, however, althou=h we won a great decision in the Court of Claims and in the Supreme Court,=the judgment we got was substantially less than the 10-year cost of our fi=ht and, therefore, much of my time was consume