Epstein Secrets

Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. VOLUME I OF II Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-

T REPORT 45 PROPERTY RECEIPTS 126 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 MR. KUVIN: Just so we're clear with 3 respect to the deposition, I understand that 4 Mr. Epstein has three attorneys here today but 5 only one of them, pursuant to the Rules, is 6 going to be permitted to object to questions. 7 So I just wa

-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. VOLUME I OF II Related cas

respect to the deposition, I understand that 4 Mr. Epstein has three attorneys here today but 5 only one o

es 74 to 77) PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. EFTA00298279 Page 78 1 Page 31. At some point there is an additional trash 2 pull done, and a U.S. Airways boarding pass is 3 obtained. Do you see that? 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. There is a name there Janusz Barrasiak? 6 A. Janusz, yes. 7 Q. Did you determi

officer under his direction." Consequently, the discretionary decision not to notify additional victims of the NPA, and risk likely impeachment by Epstein's attorneys if a criminal prosecution ensued, cannot be the basis of a finding that the government violated the CVRA. The main thrust of petitioner

00 Miami , FL 33131 Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00799973 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 11 of 11 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attor

te 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00799973 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KA

ce upon them was reasonable. Stern also relied upon Volpe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D. Fla. 1998), where the plaintiff sued defendant U.S. Airways for sexual harassment. U.S. Airways asserted as an affirmative defense that it intended to rely upon an internal investigation it had conducted 4

officer under his direction." Consequently, the discretionary decision not to notify additional victims of the NPA, and risk likely impeachment by Epstein's attorneys if a criminal prosecution ensued, cannot be the basis of a finding that the government violated the CVRA. The main thrust of petitioner

K KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami , FL 33131 Tel: (305) 371-6421; Fax: 305-358-2006 Email: Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00601691 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 11 of 11 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attor

ax: 305-358-2006 Email: Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00601691 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KA

ce upon them was reasonable. Stern also relied upon Volpe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D. Fla. 1998), where the plaintiff sued defendant U.S. Airways for sexual harassment. U.S. Airways asserted as an affirmative defense that it intended to rely upon an internal investigation it had conducted 4

Fw: Senior discounts Don't loose the list Yoou might want to use it one day Thank you anyways Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> Date: To: Jean Luc Brunel Subject: Fwd: Fw: Senior discounts ----- Forwarded message From: Date: Friday, August 9, 2013

Samsung Mobile Original message From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> Date: To: Jean Luc Brune

nt from Samsung Mobile Original message From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> Date: To: Jean L

ts for ages 65 and up (call before booking for discount) United Airlines: various discounts for ages 65 and up (call before booking for discount) U.S. Airways: various discounts for ages 65 and up (call before booking for discount) Rail: Amtrak: 15% off (62+) Car Rental: Alamo Car Rental: up to 25% off