Epstein Secrets

Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 became familiar enough with the non-prosecution agreement to both invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.1 United States' Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject matter Jurisdiction, D.E. 205-6, Exhibits A -

wsuit was that the government failed to consult with them prior to what they believed would be the disposition of the federal investigation against Epstein. D.E. I II 3,4. They knew, at the time their petition was filed, that Epstein had "recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, i

h invoke its provisions in their lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.1 United States'

A Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA EFTA00210591 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 24 of 25 provides that, Iniothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." How the Gover

officer under his direction." Consequently, the discretionary decision not to notify additional victims of the NPA, and risk likely impeachment by Epstein's attorneys if a criminal prosecution ensued, cannot be the basis of a finding that the government violated the CVRA. The main thrust of petitioner

00 Miami , FL 33131 Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00799973 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 11 of 11 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attor

te 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00799973 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KA

18 U.S.C. EFTA00799964 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 2 of 11 § 3771(d)(6), Congress commanded that, Iniothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General of any officer under his direction." Consequently

officer under his direction." Consequently, the discretionary decision not to notify additional victims of the NPA, and risk likely impeachment by Epstein's attorneys if a criminal prosecution ensued, cannot be the basis of a finding that the government violated the CVRA. The main thrust of petitioner

K KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami , FL 33131 Tel: (305) 371-6421; Fax: 305-358-2006 Email: Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00601691 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 11 of 11 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attor

ax: 305-358-2006 Email: Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00601691 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KA

18 U.S.C. EFTA00601682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 2 of 11 § 3771(d)(6), Congress commanded that, Iniothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General of any officer under his direction." Consequently