Epstein Secrets

will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00234577 Terms of the Agreement I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nob contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach Count

/3 0/0 • Dated: Dated: Dated: By: P e tritts TAM 2€ A. MARIE a ASSIST U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSITaN GERALD IJIFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREYEPSTEIN LILLYANNSANCH87, ES ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00234642 Exhibit 17 EFTA00234643 10/25/07 THU 13:16 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE

fendant Date of Plea Defendant EFTA00234616 PLEA Ilk THE CIRCUITCOURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Lester Degree C6CF039454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OSCF0D9361AMB Pr curing Person

ed during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and takes no position regarding those lawsuits. The U.S. Attorney's Office is not advising or

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Les

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

here was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12th regarding our fifth written Notice of Breach, and during the proceeding before Judge Marra, I heard again that Mr. Epstein had no intent to breach the Non-Prosecution Agreement but was merely r

will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00213055 Terms of the Agreement I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nob contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach Count

S ATTORNEY Dated: /D /3010 '7. • Dated: Dated: Bed: t ts /91W4 BY: 4 ASSIST U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSITaN GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREYEPSTEIN LILLYANNSANCH87, ES ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00213120 Exhibit 17 EFTA00213121 10/25/07 THU 13:16 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE

fendant Date of Plea Defendant EFTA00213094 PLEA Ilk THE CIRCUITCOURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Lester Degree C6CF039454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OSCF0D9361AMB Pr curing Person

FREY EPSIEN RALD LEFCO RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFF Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Les

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

here was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12th regarding our fifth written Notice of Breach, and during the proceeding before Judge Marra, I heard again that Mr. Epstein had no intent to breach the Non-Prosecution Agreement but was merely r

Ellis LLP Citi rou Center Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick Korns an & Stumpf P.A. Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu , Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs. Lefkowitz, Goldberger, and Black: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that

d during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and takes no position regarding those lawsuits. The U.S. Attorney's Office is not advising or

er, Esq. Atterbu , Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Messrs. Lefkowitz, Goldberger, and

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

here was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12th regarding our fifth written Notice of Breach, and during the proceeding before Judge Marra, I heard again that Mr. Epstein had no intent to breach the Non-Prosecution Agreement but was merely r

e Maura Klugman/New York/Kirkland-Ellis 09/22/200912:39 PM To Michelle Denny/New YorkfiGrkland-Ellis@K&E cc bcc Subject Fw: Jeffrey Epstein — Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York/Krkland-Ellis on 09/22/2009 12:01 PM -- Nillafana, Ann Marie C. r aill To "Ja L lkowl "< doj.goy> cc "A

ed during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and takes no position regarding those lawsuits. The U.S. Attorney's Office is not advising or

New YorkfiGrkland-Ellis@K&E cc bcc Subject Fw: Jeffrey Epstein — Forwarded by Kristin Andersen/New York

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

ere was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Le fkowitz of June 12th regarding our fifth written Notice of Breach, and during the proceeding before Judge Marra, I heard again that Mr. Epstein had no intent to breach the Non-Prosecution Agreement but was merely r