Epstein Secrets

R ACOSTA MITE. OATES .4ITORNel atIV.WL.Y.BY Lilly Ann Sanchez Fowler White Burnett, PA 1395 Brickell Ave, 14th Floor - Miaani.1-'1. 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein . Dear Ms. Sanchez: Yto t: a.w Cali Mmwit. Oar1961'.91rq.firkpispar 104310 Inessairie DiXember 19, 2007 1 write to follow up on the Decemberl4

it. Oar1961'.91rq.firkpispar 104310 Inessairie DiXember 19, 2007 1 write to follow up on the Decemberl4th meeting between defense counsel and the Epstein prosecutors. as well as our First Assistant, the Miami FBI Special Agent in Charge and myself.' I write to you because I am not certain who among t

in my December 4th letter, my understanding is Hun the Noriffrosectition Agreement entered into between this Office and Mr. Epstein responds to Mr. F.pstein's desire to reach a global resolution of his state and lederateriminal liability. Under this Agreement, this District has agreed to defer prosecutio

s the issue of victim's rights pursuant to Section 3771 I understand that the defense objects to the victims being given notice of lime and place of Mr Epstein's state court sentencing hearing. I have reviewed the proposed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provide

es Attorney Southern District of Florida UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 99 NE 4' STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132-2111 Jeffrey It Sloman First Assistant U.S. Attorney Cyndee Campos Staff Assistant fax FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: June 30, 2008 TO: FAX NU

-its three general federal interests: ( I ) that Mr. Epstein plead guilty to a "registerable state offense. (2

would, however, like to address one issue. Your December I letter states that as a result or defense counsel objections to the amendment "imam, the LISAO proposed an addendum to die Agreement to provide for the use of an independent third pany sekcior. As I recall this matter, before I had any knowled

ble R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4111Stnan Miami, FL 33132 Rc Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: (TIS) 680.8400 www luiluse0 corn December I I. 2IHY7 Enct:undo (Pin) 880.8500 As we discussed during our telephone conversations on

at this ease is not only extraordinary and unprecedented. ii is deeply and uniquely troubling. the constellation of issues. large and small, renders Jeffreys mutter entirely sal genesis. We say this not lightly. Indeed, as you will glean from our two letters. we are gravely concerned that, in addition to

Mr. Epstein at the sentencing. We bind no basis in law or the Agreement that pmvides the identified individuals with either a right to appear at Mr. E.pstein's plea and sentence or to submit a written statement to he filed by the State Attorney. Here. Mr. " this an.intentena does not put dose alieged "vi

id Not Tame Masseuses Under IS. Indeed, the witness slaleincots demonstrate that Mc opposite is rw hat the many of ‘• • • • VC% and visit‘ r. Epstein's home. Also, there is su canna cvr case, found in the sworn statements of the women themselves, which indicate that, to the extent others were in fac

ge 17 Attorney's Office has a different view of the case and there has been no coordination with state authoritics.6 In addition required that Mr. F.pstein's sentence include a registerahle offense. As you know, requiring sexual offender registration will have a significant impact both immediately and

ms to be able to promptly put this behind them and go ftwwards with their lives. Ilsgivcii the opportunity to opine as to the appropriateness of Mr. Fostein's proposal, in my extensive experience in these types or caws. tbe victims prefer a quick resolution with compensation for damages and will always

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2235 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when. after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement. we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of restitution fund:

21 LRJ, MEDREQ, REF_DISCOV U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80119-1CAM Doe v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson Member case: (View Member Case) Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Caus

ON Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No- Contact Order Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plaintiffi Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. Associate

red: 02/08/2008) 05/22/2008 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/22/2008 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jeffrey Epstein served on 5/7/2008, Answer due 5/27/2008. (Ik) (Entere

FTA00175604 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 17 of 21 05/20/2009 Ma NOTICE be. of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raise Lions to Defendant. Jetey Epstein's Motion to Ag And/Or IdentifyMf. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identi . in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Alternati

. 2 I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S S

legations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him "a massage for monetary comp

he witness has reasonable cause to apprehend danger' of criminal liability. Hoffman'. United States, 341 U.S. 479,486 (1951). 7 This could give the LISAO a tremendous advantage in prosecuting Epstein in the Federal Criminal Action. See Comment, Using Equitable Powers to Coordinate Parallel Civil and C

33401 Dear Alex: Facaimaa: mint kirklancl.cOM Dlr. Fax: ConfidentlaL For Settlement Purposes Only, Pursuant to Rule 408. October 10, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write as' follow up to our conversation yesterday regarding the open issues that remain Si stein matter. As you are aware, we continue to have se

he conduct at issue, in an effort to avoid long drawn out disputes over liability in public adversarial litigations. Initially, we proposed that Mr. Epstein create' trust whereby' trustee would be appointed by the Circuit Court to disperse the funds to the identified individuals based on' good faith sho

ance and statements or a member of your Office or the pB12 2 We arc concerned with the fact that some of the victims were previously notified, as Mr. Jeffrey slates in his letter of December 6 letter. In your letter of December 4. you state that you would not issue the Victim Notification lamer until De

h as we pprcciate your willingness to revisit the § 2255 issues, we cannot accept your language as proposed, because we believe that the conduct of Mr_ Epstein with respect to these alleged i ictinis fails to satisfy the requisite elements of any of the enumerated offenses, including 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) or

nited Stales shall provide F.pstein's attorney's with a list of individuals whom it has identified as victims, as defined in IS U.S.C. f 2255. alter Epsicin has signed this agreement and has been sentenced. Upon the execution of this agreement. the United States. in consultation with und subject to the

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2255 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when, after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement. we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of I restitution fun

05 961 9461 305 530-6444 fax FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: June 2, 2008 TO: Marie Villafana FAX NUMBER: (561) 820 8777 SUBJECT: Epstein NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 9 Message/Comments: This facsimile contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the us

We come to you in that spirit and respectfully ask for a review of the federal involvement in a quintessentially state matter involving our client, Jeffrey Epstein. While we are well aware of the tare instances in which a review of this sort is justified, we are confident that the circumstances at issue %valia

IDA 99 NE 4TH STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132-2111 Jeffrey H. Sloman First Assistant U.S. Attorney 305 961

have contemplated a prosecution in this ease it' Mr. Epstein tror: jos; menher "John." I. Attorney Acosta p

at Agreement. appears to have been deliberately designed to deprive as or an adequate opportunity II, seek your Offices review iu this minter. lice LISAO's desire to etveclose :t Complete review is tmclersiamtible. yivew than the Child Fsploitation and Obscenity Section ("CLOS- ) has already determine

e R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein INair Alex: 777 South Finumon Sunni tun Attuuluu, et-tidying, 900'7 (213) 080-8400 www.lorNItuul.com December I I. 2007 HICSul Wu: (213) 600.

at this case is not only extraordinary and unprecedented. it is deeply and uniquely troubling. The constellation of issues. large and small. renders Jeffrey's matter entirely sal genesis. We say this not lightly. Indeed, as you will glean from our two letters. we arc gravely concerned Mat in addition to

Was I S because said .. . if you're not then he [Epsteinl won't wally let you in his house. So I said I wa

ded to review some of the issues and concerns of Mr. Epstein's defense learn. Importantly. I appreciate your a

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2255 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when. after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement, we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of tt restitution fu