9
Shared Docs
9
Same-Page
24 / 9
Mentions
statute sets a mandatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (
ndatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("Agreement
he request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office
l concession since 18 U.S.C. § 2255 provides that Mr. Epstein would be required to pay the plaintiff's attorne
d faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On November 11, 2008, I provided a copy of you
statute sets a mandatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (
ndatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("Agreement
he request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office
l concession since 18 U.S.C. § 2255 provides that Mr. Epstein would be required to pay the plaintiff's attorne
d faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On November 11, 2008, I rovided a co of our l
statute sets a mandatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (
ndatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("Agreement
he request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office
l concession since 18 U.S.C. § 2255 provides that Mr. Epstein would be required to pay the plaintiff's attorne
d faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November er and all attachments to my Northern Region, U.S. At
statute sets a mandatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (
ndatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("Agreement
he request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office
l concession since 18 U.S.C. § 2255 provides that Mr. Epstein would be required to pay the plaintiff's attorne
d faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On November 11, 2008, I provided a copy of you
statute sets a mandatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (
ndatory minimum amount of damages with no upper limit on any damages award. At the request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office entered into pre-indictment plea negotiations that resulted in the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("Agreement
he request of counsel for the putative defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), the U.S. Attorney's Office
l concession since 18 U.S.C. § 2255 provides that Mr. Epstein would be required to pay the plaintiff's attorne
d faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On November 11, 2008, I provided a copy of you
copy of the letter to Mr. Mermelstein's partner, Jeffrey Herman, with a note explaining why the letter wa
d faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On November 11, 2008, I provided a copy of you
copy of the letter to Mr. Mermelstein's partner, Jeffrey Herman, with a note explaining why the letter wa
nd faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On November 11, 2008, I provided a copy of yo
copy of the letter to Mr. Mermelstein's partner, Jeffrey Herman, with a note explaining why the letter wa
nd faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On November 11, 2008, I provided a copy of yo
copy of the letter to Mr. Mermelstein's partner, Jeffrey Herman, with a note explaining why the letter wa
d faxed that paperwork to you on October 7, 2008. Mr. Mermelstein did not copy me on the correspondence that he sent to you, so I first learned of the Bar Complaint when I received your letter of November 6, 2008. I received that correspondence on November 10, 2008. On No I provided a copy of your letter and a
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and the Bar Complaint

United States
LOCATION
FedEx
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Sarah Ferguson
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSONKatherine W. Ezell
PERSON
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
Karen Atkinson
PERSON
Podhurst Orseck
ORGANIZATION
Jeffrey Marc Herman
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON
Thomas Jefferson
PERSONFlorida Bar
ORGANIZATION
Tallahassee
LOCATIONMermelstein
PERSONNorthern Region
LOCATION
Brewer
PERSON