Epstein Secrets

will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00234577 Terms of the Agreement I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nob contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach Count

/3 0/0 • Dated: Dated: Dated: By: P e tritts TAM 2€ A. MARIE a ASSIST U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSITaN GERALD IJIFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREYEPSTEIN LILLYANNSANCH87, ES ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00234642 Exhibit 17 EFTA00234643 10/25/07 THU 13:16 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE

fendant Date of Plea Defendant EFTA00234616 PLEA Ilk THE CIRCUITCOURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Lester Degree C6CF039454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OSCF0D9361AMB Pr curing Person

ed during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and takes no position regarding those lawsuits. The U.S. Attorney's Office is not advising or

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Les

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7t° meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the arguments

will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00213055 Terms of the Agreement I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nob contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach Count

S ATTORNEY Dated: /D /3010 '7. • Dated: Dated: Bed: t ts /91W4 BY: 4 ASSIST U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSITaN GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREYEPSTEIN LILLYANNSANCH87, ES ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00213120 Exhibit 17 EFTA00213121 10/25/07 THU 13:16 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE

fendant Date of Plea Defendant EFTA00213094 PLEA Ilk THE CIRCUITCOURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Lester Degree C6CF039454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OSCF0D9361AMB Pr curing Person

FREY EPSIEN RALD LEFCO RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFF Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Les

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7t° meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the ar ems r

I wanted to thank you for making the time for breakfast Friday. It was great to catch up. Following up on our conversation about the date for Mr. Epstein's plea, where you said that you didn't want to dictate a schedule to the state, as we discussed I have a case where I represent an individual who i

hout success, including allowing the Petitioners, that is Jane Does #1 and #2, and their counsel, the opportunity to meet with the U.S. Attorney, as Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys did.' Despite the Petitioners' earlier statement to the Court that no additional facts were needed, many hours were spent trying to revi

r information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you again for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, United States Attorney By: Jeffrey First Assistant United States Attorney cc: AUSA US_Atty_Cor_00226 EFTA00184837 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02

nt set by Congress as of the date of the occurrences) or $150.000 (the amount currently set by statute) or some other agreed upon damage amount. Mr. P.pstein must pay for the services of the selected attorney representative as long as they are limited to settling the claims of the identified individuals.

OFFICE Finally, I would like to address a more general point Our Agreement was first signed on September 24th, 2007. Pursuant to paragraph II, Mr. Epsteinwas to use his best efforts to enter his guilty pies raid be sentenced no later than October 26,2007. As outlined in correspondence between our prosecu

ext week. Accordingly, I have now confirmed with Mr. Epstein's Florida counsel that the state's attorney's of

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7th meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the arguments

A UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4Srne1 Miami. FL 33132 (303)961-9100. Telephone (303) 530.6444 Facsimile I write in response to your November 28'h lett

response to your November 28'h letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter focused on the Section 2255 portion of the Agreement, my response will focus primarily on that iss

outh Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4Srne1 Miami.

on Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7th meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the arguments

osecution Agreement, an October 2007 Addendum and a letter dated December 19, 2007 from the U.S. Attorney to Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez , Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein (DE 35 at ¶3).' I I assume those involved in the above-referenced litigation, have copies of the relevant court filings, but if you desire any of t

he Victim's Petition further alleges that in violation of the CVRA, Jane Doe #1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "th

States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting co

Villafafia indicates that "in the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the [USAO-SDFLA] entered into negotiations t

ration are AUSA Villafaila's letters to the victim's counsel, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. DE 14. Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, F.B.I. is copied on AUSA Villafafia's letters and Special Agent Richards and Kuyrkendall are referenced in certain letters to Mr. Edwards. DE 14. Moreover, Epstein's counsel, Jack Goldb

A UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 ME. 4 Street 331 2 - Faalmlle I write in response to your November 286 letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non

n response to your November 286 letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter focused on the Section 2255 portion of the Agreement, my response will focus primarily on that iss

nvestigating the facts of the victims' claims and turned more to Mr. Epstein's background, his asserted defenses, co- 'First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey is sending a letter under separate cover addressing some of the items in the correspondence from you and Mr. Lefkowitz, since he has been directly

on Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7'h meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the arguments

ange of plea on June 30, 2008 but did not have any contact with any member of the SAO that day. Later, when the issue arose regarding whether or not Epstein was taking the position that the NPA included USA Acosta's December 2007 letter, I contacted Ms. Behlolavek and SA Krischer to obtain a copy of wha

pstein would be pleading guilty on June 30, 2008, I would not release the witness (id). I formally withdrew the subpoena on June 30, 2008, following Jeffrey Epstein's entry of his guilty plea in state court (Exhibit B-135). These activities took us up to the time of Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea. Fro

IA FACSIMILE Brad Edwards, Esq. The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020. Re: Jeffrey EpsteinMIM NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Mr. Edwards: By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern Dis

prosecution of any potential co-conspirators of Mr. Epstein, including unidentified co-conspirators. I do n

he West Palm Beach Office and is now the liaison to the Greater Palm Beach County Health Care Fraud Task Force. Since returning to West Palm Beach, AUSA Villafafia's caseload has shifted more towards economic crimes, but she has worked on a wide array of cases including insurance fraud, varying types of health c

From: To: Cc: subject: Re: Jane Does I U.S. (re Jeffrey Epstein) - Litigation Hold - Additional Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:19:29 +0000 Importance: Normal P.s. I think you have to take your start date back much f

foa 9999 • Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution Agreement • Lilly Ann Sanchez, Counsel For Epstein • Jack Goldberger, Counsel for Epstein • Assistant United States Attorney • Special Agent, F.B.I. • Special Agent F.B.I. • 1M, Assistan

rom: To: Cc: subject: Re: Jane Does I U.S. (re Jeffrey Epstein) - Litigation Hold - Additional Date: Th

ential. If the USAO-SDFLA Lit Hold efforts are ever the subject of discovery, we can redact the victim names...as was done in the letters filed with AUSA Villafafia's first declaration. Also, I will need your assistance in preparing letters to the FBI and Palm Beach P.D. to urge them to place a Hold on any docum

officer under his direction." Consequently, the discretionary decision not to notify additional victims of the NPA, and risk likely impeachment by Epstein's attorneys if a criminal prosecution ensued, cannot be the basis of a finding that the government violated the CVRA. The main thrust of petitioner

00 Miami , FL 33131 Roy E. Black BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00799973 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 11 of 11 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attor

te 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00799973 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KA

would impeach the victims and my credibility by asserting that I told victims they could receive money for implicating Epstein." Id. The basis for AUSA Villafafia's decision was offered to demonstrate that it was the 2 EFTA00799965 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 3 o

officer under his direction." Consequently, the discretionary decision not to notify additional victims of the NPA, and risk likely impeachment by Epstein's attorneys if a criminal prosecution ensued, cannot be the basis of a finding that the government violated the CVRA. The main thrust of petitioner

K KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami , FL 33131 Tel: (305) 371-6421; Fax: 305-358-2006 Email: Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00601691 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 11 of 11 Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attor

ax: 305-358-2006 Email: Attorneys for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein 10 EFTA00601691 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KA

would impeach the victims and my credibility by asserting that I told victims they could receive money for implicating Epstein." Id. The basis for AUSA Villafafia's decision was offered to demonstrate that it was the 2 EFTA00601683 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 3 o