Epstein Secrets

ich friend was that? A. His name was Brian. TI don't know his last name. I really didn't know [Jand « didn't know her friends or whatever, but I met Jeffrey. And once I met Jeffrey, he was a very awesome guy and I just -- I don't know. <I ended up giving him my number so x could -- I didn't want J or Bria

time? A. Yes. Q. You would get $200 every time she came? A. Yes. Q. Good deal. Okay. What about EP A. EEE 10? Q. any i that you brought to Mr. Epstein’s house. Page 30 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012311 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ay oO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 mo AN OD uo S&F WwW KN 04-25 Po where did she go to

m. (Thereupon, the interview ended.) (Pages 10 to 13) 4 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012362 Page 12}: Page 13 02423 TAB 10 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012363 IN RE: JEFFREY EPSTEIN VZIDEOTAPED INTERVIEW as 060ml 02528 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012364 1 (Uhereupon, the following videotaped interview was 1 2 had:} : 2 4 BY DETECTIVE REC

GHT_012357 TAB 9 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012358 TN RF: JBPPREY EPSTEIN TAPED INTERVIEW OF P| DIRAF T 02420 HOUSE_OVE

bout EP A. EEE 10? Q. any i that you brought to Mr. Epstein’s house. Page 30 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012311 19 20

igration offenses, criminal labor violations, and extortion, in addition to other criminal statutes, Accordingly, DOJ traiming at annual conferences, the National Advocacy Center, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and field training with the Department of Justice funded Human Trafficking Task Forces and p

2018, the criminal investigative files and original evidence related to the investigation conducted by them in the Southern District of Florida of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators, notwithstanding any general rule or regulation allowing earlier destruction of evidence in closed matters. Should the USA

e the opportunity to attend a joint meeting with the current U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to express their concerns about the Epstein investigation and its resolution. The current Page 3 of 7 EFTA00211218 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN U.S. Attorn

d by them in the Southern District of Florida of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators, notwithstanding

oint motion asking the Court to return to Respondent all documents previously submitted for in camera review. 9. The USAO-SDFL agrees to work with the National Advocacy Center to produce a taped training session on the Crime Victims Rights Act, which will include a taped segment involving the participation of Jane Doe #1.

2018, the criminal investigative files and original evidence related to the investigation conducted by them in the Southern District of Florida of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators, notwithstanding any general rule or regulation allowing earlier destruction of evidence in closed matters. Should the USAO

e the opportunity to attend a joint meeting with the current U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to express their concerns about the Epstein investigation and its resolution. The current U.S. Attorney Page 3 of 6 EFTA00211590 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CASE No. 08-80736-CI V-MARRA/MATTHEWMA

d by them in the Southern District of Florida of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators, notwithstanding

oint motion asking the Court to return to Respondent all documents previously submitted for in camera review. 9. The USAO-SDFL agrees to work with the National Advocacy Center to produce a taped training session on the Crime Victims Rights Act, which will include a taped segment involving the participation of Jane Doe #1.

: FW: CVRA case - meeting in July Here is the latest from the plaintiffs. I don't believe we can provide any update on what is going on in the "new" Epstein case, unless the CVRA provides a right to be given status reports to a crime victim. Insofar as the rest of the e-mail, I'm going to respond to Jud

hat is what occurred. However, the government does not agree that it violated the CVRA, or that plaintiffs are entitled to any relief. I will be at the National Advocacy Center in Columbia, South Carolina, from October 17-21. I will have access to my e- mails but it may be difficult for me to respond quickly to what you send

y to what you send to me. Also, in determining whether your statement of facts is correct, I will need to consult with my colleague who handled the Epstein matter. From: Paul Cassell [mailto Sent: TuescSOctober 12, 2010 3:47 PM To: M, (USAFLS) Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: CVRA case Hi (if I may), I

hat is what occurred. However, the government does not agree that it violated the CVRA, or that plaintiffs are entitled to any relief. I will be at the National Advocacy Center in Columbia, South Carolina, from October 17-21. I will have access to my e- mails but it may be difficult for me to respond quickly to what you send