Epstein Secrets

ring on Appropriate Remedies (unredacted), and a complete set of exhibits, including the e-mails in Exhibit A. The e-mails in Exhibit A are between Epstein's defense attorney and AUSA Villafaba. They were produced in civil litigation between Epstein and some of his victims. Epstein's attorneys redacted

e 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (tereinaRer, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Of fice has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in vio

criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further urge you to take t

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his clients

formally signed a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein that barred his I The victims are contem

li also stated that KELLEN ,has twin, boys . recalled seeing sculptures of kids in the library. naked Women and lots stated that everybody thought Epsteirt SI was a 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000748' EFTA00230572 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 3 JANE DOE #

ASE NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes now, Bruce E. Reinhart, intervenor and party in interest (hereinafter "Movant"), and moves this Honorable Court to imp

ring on Appropriate Remedies (unredacted), and a complete set of exhibits, including the e-mails in Exhibit A. The e-mails in Exhibit A are between Epstein's defense attorney and AUSA Villafalta. They were produced in civil litigation between Epstein and some of his victims. Epstein's attorneys redacted

e 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (tereinaRer, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Of fice has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in vio

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his clients

formally signed a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein that barred his I The victims are contem

criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further urge you to take t

FLORIDA CASE NO. OS-80736-Ov JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes now, Bruce E. Reinhart, intervenor and party in interest (hereinafter "Movant"), and moves this Honorable Court to imp

ment 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/012011 Page 2 of 4 violated Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the undersigned retired from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "Of

n FLSD Docket 05/012011 Page 2 of 4 violated Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the undersigned retired from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "Office"). Th

Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the

s retained to represent several other members of Mr. Epstein's staff in their civil depositions. 15. After

NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marrailohnson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes now, Bruce E. Reinhart, intervenor and party in interest (hereinafter "Movant"), and moves this Honorable Court to imp

s claims by Plaintiffs that Defendant violated the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. §3771, in its handling of a criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and others. The investigation ultimately resulted in a non-prosecution agreement between the United States and Epstein. On EFTA00205075

iffs that Defendant violated the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. §3771, in its handling of a criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and others. The investigation ultimately resulted in a non-prosecution agreement between the United States and Epstein. On EFTA00205075 Case 9:

, in its handling of a criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and others. The investigation

s retained to represent several other members of Mr. Epstein's staff in their civil depositions. 15. After

NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marrailohnson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes now, Bruce E. Reinhart, intervenor and party in interest (hereinafter "Movant"), and moves this Honorable Court to imp

l relevant times, the Office had approximately 20 Assistant U.S. Attorneys assigned to the West Palm Beach location. The prosecutor assigned to the Epstein case, I I end I were assigned to different sections within the Office. We reported to different supervisors. 11. I did not participate in any way

ent 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 2 of 4 violated Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the undersigned retired from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "Of

Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the

s retained to represent several other members of Mr. Epstein's staff in their civil depositions. I5.. After

FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ- JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes now, Bruce B. Reinhart, intervenor and party in interest (hereinafter "Movant"), and moves this Honorable Court to imp

l relevant times, the Office had approximately 20 Assistant U.S. Attorneys assigned to the West Palm Beach location. The prosecutor assigned to the Epstein case, Ann Marie Villafana, end I were assigned to different sections within the Office. We reported to different supervisors. 11. I did not partic

ent 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 2 of 4 violated Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the undersigned retired from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "Of

Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the

s retained to represent several other members of Mr. Epstein's staff in their civil depositions. I5.. After

NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Jolmson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. BRUCE E. REINHART, Intervenor INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Comes now, Bruce B. Reinhart, intervenor and party in interest (hereinafter "Movant"), and moves this Honorable Court to imp

THER, individually, Plaintiffs, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1, Intervenor-Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. INTERVENOR'S COMPLAINT Intervenor-Plaintiff, JANE DOE's MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1, by

n action for damages in excess of Fifty Million ($50,000,000.00) Dollars. Factual Allegations 6. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is hims

n of JANE DOE NO. 1, Intervenor-Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. INTERVENOR'S COMPLAINT Int

s, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1, Intervenor-Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. INTERVENOR'S COMPLAINT Intervenor-Plaintiff, JANE DOE's MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through the undersig