Epstein Secrets

est 1998 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works Not Reported in F.Supp. (Cite as: 1998 WL 159055 (S.D.N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Rob

sion of the building pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. OFM leased the building to defendant Jeffrey E. Epstein in 1992. Epstein sublet the building to defendant Ivan S. Fisher in 1996, purportedly without the Government's consent. Fisher, in turn, sublet a portion of the bui

N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa

N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa

(noting that cases where the formulation of a "special federal rule" are "few and restricted"); Kamen v. Kemper Fin. Servs., Inc., 500 U.S. 90, 98, Ill S.Ct. 1711, 114 L.Ed.2d 152 (1991) (noting that a federal court "should endeavor to fill the interstices of federal remedial schemes with uniform federal

d as COnsaa Is binding and ow/ not be Menem arter the CorpOratkrn has made a mid election. (Shareholders sign and date belted Otw Signature Date Jeffrey E. Epstein 6100 Red Hook Qugrte Suite B-3 - . ..! 1 --1-' 100 1/1/01 12/3 bin, ThUITIMS I UbV UV* I. 2 ( • t1 under penalties or perjury. I declar

-000101 EFTA00227481 imp-u'stuu0 Oi:b0pe Froe-J Epstein i Coapany, Inc T-150 P.004/005 F-135 CERTIFIC

olders sign and date belted Otw Signature Date Jeffrey E. Epstein 6100 Red Hook Qugrte Suite B-3 - . .

olders sign and date belted Otw Signature Date Jeffrey E. Epstein 6100 Red Hook Qugrte Suite B-3 - . ..

federal grand jury is to be afforded wide latitude in conducting its investigation. See United States v. R. Enters., Inc.. 498 U.S. 292, 297.98, Ill S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991); United States v. Calandra. 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613. 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). 'A grand jury investigation 'is

cument(s) or object(s): Tapes or transcripts of any and all proceedings before the Grand Jury on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or , including but not limited to witness testimony, statements made by any member of the State Attorney's Office, and instructions given by an

July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or , including but not limited to witness t

dnesday, July 19, 2006, referring or relating to Jeffrey Epstein and/or , including but not limited to wi

federal grand jury is to be afforded wide latitude in conducting its investigation. See United States V. R. Enters., Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 297-98, Ill S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991); Milted States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). "A grand jury investigation 'is

2011. A FD-302 report was entered on July 5, 2013. See Exhibit A. During the interview process, the FBI agents informed t they had retrieved from Jeffrey E stein's homes, video to es, CDs and DVDs, pictures an documents, that include video tapes of d documents (including but not limited to e-mails and other r

d from the following residences owned by Jeffrey Epstein. 1) 358 El Brillo Way Palm Beach, Florida 3348

e FBI agents informed t they had retrieved from Jeffrey E stein's homes, video to es, CDs and DVDs, picture

federal grand jury is to be afforded wide latitude in conducting its investigation. See United States v. R. Enters., Inc.. 498 U.S. 292. 297-98, Ill S.Ct. 722, 726, 112 L.Ed.2d 795 (1991); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974). "A grand jury investigation 'is

defendant-appellant Miguel Plascencia-Alvarado. Jeffrey E. Ellis, Law Offices of Ellis, Holmes & Witchley,

defendant-appellant Miguel Plascencia-Alvarado. Jeffrey E. Ellis, Law Offices of Ellis, Holmes & Witchley,

mindful of the fact that a district court 'retains great latitude in deciding wl illy • should be asked on voir dire.' Mu'Min 500 U.S. 415, 424, Ill S.Ct. 1899, 114 . . 493 (1991). We ascertain only whether the district court ensured that Middleton had 'a fair r trial by a el of impartial, "indiff