Epstein Secrets

office. I informed her that I wanted to get copies of the sworn statements our clients gave to FBI investigators during the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, and that I needed instructions from her as to the proper procedure. 3. Ms. Moore informed me that it was a three-step process: First, I should ser

ein To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find federal subpoenas for the sworn statements of several witnesses taken during the investigation of Jeffrey Edward Epstein between approximately 2006 and 2007. The statements we seek are those given to the FBI by our clients, each of whom has brought suit as a Jane Doe

3/22/2010 EFTA00128715 JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEF•Y EPSTEIN Page 1 of 1 ' JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEI

/2010 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEM, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-8109

, FL 33169 aat":6926E.-."09 C007 LIMNS esPN 02 1P $ 000.61 ° 0003952374 MAR 17 2010 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 33160 EFTA00128728 Jane Doe 2-7 vs. Jeffrey Eplin Page 1 of 1 Jane Doe 2-7 vs. Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 3:01 PM To: (USAFLS) Good afternoon I= I spoke with she made me

tance. Parale al Sec., FBI https://www.324mail.corn/owanae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAAAJ2YReGj4eTp5Q... 3/22/2010 EFTA00128715 JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEF•Y EPSTEIN Page 1 of 1 ' JANE DOE NO. 2 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:25 AM To: (USAFLS) Good morning U, I just received a copy of

investigators during the FBI's investigation of Defendant Epstein. The FBI, which has received notice of this Motio

orth Miami Beach, FL 33169 Re: Jane Does 2-7 v. Jeffrey stein To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please

sions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Supreme Coutt, See U.S. a rel, Touhv, v. Ram 340 U.S. 462 (1951). In addition, the Privacy Act (Title 5, U.S.C., Section 552O), prohibits the release of agency records pertaining to an

HILD PROSTITUTION Status ' P PENDING Squad ' PB2 PB2 Source ' 11 OTHER Case Type Opened • 07/25/2006 Identity Theft . . : N EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Title Summary eacIP_Aoy—t: 1 Command > F1=Help,F3=Exit,F4=Prompt,F6=multv,F7=Bkwd,F8=Fwd,P11=NextPg,F12.cancel F13=ListSerial 4A0 03,074

half about the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment: Jane Doe ) Pfainre ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-80893CIV-MARRA/JOHNSO Jeffrey Epstein ) ) (If the action is pending in another district, state where: Ph Defendant ) ea —liri SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION ‘0 \4°CC Ciat - O

e Opened • 07/25/2006 Identity Theft . . : N EPSTEIN, JEFFREY Title Summary eacIP_Aoy—t: 1 Comman

sions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Supreme Court. See U.S. ex rel, Touhv v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). To obtain FBI investigative information, the party making the request must provide to this office an affidavit, or s

Skipped Mandatory Checks Before Epstein Death From To Date 2019/08/11 09:45 Subject: Re: Reuters: Prison Guards Skipped Mandatory Checks Before Epstein Death Attachments: TEXT.htm Great. I'll call at noon and have on the line. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message

rk 10007 fria. >> > Samanta Honigman < Hello > 7/24/2019 3:17 PM > » I left you a voicemail earlier today regarding my paralegal application for Jeffrey Epstein, Reg. #76318-054.1 was told today by the lobby guards that I had to re-submit my application and to ask the legal department directly on the reason

lier today regarding my paralegal application for Jeffrey Epstein, Reg. #76318-054.1 was told today by the

subpoenaed records will be provided to the United States Attorney's Office for a determination of whether to release the documents, pursuant to the Touhv regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. 2. Medical Records Medical records may be obtained by defense counsel with a Consent to Release Authoriza

(USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests All, (USANYS) >; Closing the loop on this: we produced documents responsive to an Epstein victim's Touhy request about a month ago. The requesters got back to us (by phone) with a fairly lengthy list of follow-up questions about what we p

S) Cc: <MMa'; (USANYS) (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Thanks for the further in

S) Cc: <MMa'; (USANYS) (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Thanks for the fu

E: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests >; I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, tinder Touhv section 16.22(6), the responsible USA is the USA for the district "where the issuing authority" is located. They actually have an action filed in t

Cc: (USANYS) ) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests All, <->; Closing the loop on this: we produced documents responsive to an Epstein victim's Touhy request about a month ago. The requesters got back to us (by phone) with a fairly lengthy list of follow-up questions about what we p

: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests All, >;I <->; Please find attached a letter responding to the Touhy request for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein submitted by a victim who is a plaintiff in a civil suit against Epstein's estate. I am also attaching the documents to be produced in response to

(USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests <a> ) <->; Unde

tein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) ; <->; I have some hesitation on just referring them to NDGa for the SDFla investigative stuff. First, under Touhv section 16.22(b), the responsible USA is the USA for the district "where the issuing authority" is located. They actually have an action filed in t