S. Attorney's Office in SDFL. As relevant here, for example, we do not have any materials relating to the purported immunity discussions relating to Lacerda; we have not identified any such materials in the FBI files, and we assume that any discussions or correspondence on that issue likely would have be

, Steven (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: >; (USANYS) O; ) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin

S. Attorney's Office in SDFL. As relevant here, for example, we do not have any materials relating to the purported immunity discussions relating to Lacerda; we have not identified any such materials in the FBI EFTA00104393 files, and we assume that any discussions or correspondence on that issue likel

, Steven (USANYS) I (USANYS) <IMM ); Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin

S. Attorney's Office in SDFL. As relevant here, for example, we do not have any materials relating to the purported immunity discussions relating to Lacerda; we have not identified any such materials in the FBI files, and we assume that any discussions or correspondence on that issue likely would have be

ven (USANYS) (USANYS) .< ; Cc: (USANYS) <M > C ) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin

Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) ) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin

S. Attorney's Office in SDFL. As relevant here, for example, we do not have any materials relating to the purported immunity discussions relating to Lacerda; we have not identified any such materials in the FBI files, and we assume that any discussions or correspondence on that issue likely would have be

Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) ) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin

S. Attorney's Office in SDFL. As relevant here, for example, we do not have any materials relating to the purported immunity discussions relating to Lacerda; we have not identified any such materials in the FBI files, and we assume that any discussions or correspondence on that issue likely would have be

uesday, June 17, 2008 4:43 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Grand Jury Appearance Dear Ms. Villafana: I have a call in to Ms. Lacerda for the requested information. I will contact you once I have it. One concern: I have an appearance in New York State court on Wednesday morning, Ju

AM To: Brendan White Cc: Ball, Shawn (USAFLS) Subject: Cancellation of Grand Jury Appearance Dear Mr. White: At this time, the subpoena of Ms. Lacerda is withdrawn. If that should change, I will contact you. A. Marie Villafaila Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm

1:20 AM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Cancellation of Grand Jury Appearance Thank you for letting me know. I will inform Ms. Lacerda. Brendan -- Original Message ---- From: Villafana. Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) To: Brendan White Cc: Ball, Shawn (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008

ndle it. Let me know what time, I will keep the day open. New York is not going well. The Agents are still trying to locate (we now know here me) Lacerda but no luck thus far. When we ran the n TECS, a Marina dob 07/09/1990 departe on Jan 28, 2008 for Brazil and has not returne . We can not connec

one number during the relevant period). Thus, the likelihood of succeeding on sue a prosecution is very small. Furthermore, a decision to prosecute Lacerda could result in a refusal by many more girls to come forward because the majority of the identified girls brought other girls to Epstein, so all of

uld like to interview She has been identified by two victims as someone who recruited numerous others to Epstein's New York residence. We know that Lacerda was going to Epstein's home when she was 14, and it is possible that she was going there as early as 13. This trip is contingent upon approval from

nday pursuant to a deferred prosecution agreement with your office that has already been executed. Since this would seem to obviate any need for Ms. Lacerda to testify, please let me know what is going on with respect to this Tuesday. Do we still need to come down there and, if so, will she receive court

ie C. (USAFLS1 To: Brendan White Cc: Ball Shawn (USARSI Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 11:27 AM Subject: Grand Jury Appearance Dear Mr. White: Ms. Lacerda will need to appear before the grand jury on July 1m to give testimony. Please contact my assistant, Shawn Ball, at 561 820-8711, ext. 3037, to make

ave I received information confirming that the plea will be in conformance with our agreement. As such, at this time, 1 still intend to present Ms. Lacerda's testimony to the grand jury on Tuesday. With respect to the immunity question, I refer you to my e-mail of June 2314, which is shown below. If th

ave I received information confirming that the plea will be in conformance with our agreement. As such, at this time, I still intend to present Ms. Lacerda's testimony to the grand jury on Tuesday. With respect to the immunity question, I refer you to my e-mail of June 23rd, which is shown below. If th

ave I received information confirming that the plea will be in conformance with our agreement. As such, at this time, 1 still intend to present Ms. Lacerda's testimony to the grand jury on Tuesday. With respect to the immunity question, I refer you to my e-mail of June 23Id, which is shown below. If th

, 2008 2:09 PM Subject: RE: Grand Jury Appearance Dear Mr. White: Please feel free to make your own travel arrangements, but if you would like Ms. Lacerda's travel costs to be reimbursed, they must be made through the government's approved agency on the approved carriers. Regarding the immunity, at th

ave I received information confirming that the plea will be in conformance with our agreement. As such, at this time, I still intend to present Ms. Lacerda's testimony to the grand jury on Tuesday. With respect to the immunity question, I refer you to my e-mail of June 23id, which is shown below. If th

nday pursuant to a deferred prosecution agreement with your office that has already been executed. Since this would seem to obviate any need for Ms. Lacerda to testify, please let me know what is going on with respect to this Tuesday. Do we still need to come down there and, if so, will she receive court

ar, Steven (USANYS) 4 Cc: (USANYS) ) (USANYS) dc ); Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests 1 take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosin