ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) ifl; (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: R

Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 9:34 AM To Subject: RE: ''1234 (FBI Interview)27 Thanks, . NY will handle. • Hi . ADC who was handling the Touhys in this civil litigation is now a SAUSA EDNY and no longer in the legal unit. Do you know if there is a civil AUSA who is assisting with the USVI r

div, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: S (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: ivIcEnany, John (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE:

v, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFIa's recusal. I can't see NIX, \ racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: S (USANYS) < (USANYS) c > Cc: < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Tou

div, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. EFTA00088114

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) ‹ > Cc: I < Subject: RE

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: gc > Subject: RE: Jeffr

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < =); (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject:

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Muhry does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) <a > ) <-

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhv does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) ) Subject

div, like for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: M = (USANYS) ; (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Relat

ike Sarah for instance. Also, it is possible that Touhy does not fall within the scope of SDFla's recusal. I can't see NDGA racing to embrace doing Touhys on this. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:24 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < =); (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: