Epstein Secrets

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 16-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 4 : tiP • ' CASE PIO ±-122OO.1.:IFO-51/4 541sXXX CF V. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Z41 'FP ^i ria4 Y tr..mr.y..PRzia"rtnivz•zrt : . • . 7 'Crt. Rep. lun,L__ Date : • -17 vcri J „Asir )----=-- • / PD e--P:9fot Pres, D

events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. Factual Allegations 7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is hims

, represented by Assistant United States , and Mr. Epstein, entered into a deferred- prosecution agreement (

' CASE PIO ±-122OO.1.:IFO-51/4 541sXXX CF V. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Z41 'FP ^i ria4 Y tr..mr.y..PRzia"r

ach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691 By: Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger®agwpa.com Attorneys for Defendant Jay Epstein CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 711.A.3 While defense counsel admittedly did not confer with plaintiffs' counsel prior to filing the moti

l distress based on the same factual allegations. Defendant Epstein has moved to dismiss only Count I of the Complai

' CASE PIO ±-122OO.1.:IFO-51/4 541sXXX CF V. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Z41 'FP ^i ria4 Y tr..mr.y..PRzia"rt

orp. supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations ibid.. Sanivan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology. Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (C.A.7 1994), a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief

21 LRJ, MEDREQ, REF_DISCOV U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80119-1CAM Doe v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson Member case: (View Member Case) Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Caus

ON Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No- Contact Order Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plaintiffi Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. Associate

red: 02/08/2008) 05/22/2008 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/22/2008 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jeffrey Epstein served on 5/7/2008, Answer due 5/27/2008. (Ik) (Entere

FTA00175604 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 17 of 21 05/20/2009 Ma NOTICE be. of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raise Lions to Defendant. Jetey Epstein's Motion to Ag And/Or IdentifyMf. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identi . in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Alternati

. 2 I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S S

legations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him "a massage for monetary comp

Corp., supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) moti to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations ibid.; Saniva . American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology. Inc. 40 F.3d 247, 251 .7 1994), a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief' re

ket 06/05/2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. Y EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF, M.'S, CONDITIONAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO EXCLUSIVELY RELY ON STATUTORY DAMAGES PROVIDED BY 18 U.S.C. 42255 Plaintiff, ,

Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, files his reply to Plaintiffs Memorandum in Response to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's, Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint For Failure to State A Cause of Action; And Motion for More Definite Statement; Motion to Strike, And Sup

tion either under statutory or common law against Defendant EPSTEIN. Count I fails to plead any requisite elements o

tion to recover money damages against Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for acts of sexual abuse and prostitutio

eed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enum

p., supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, ibid.; Sanivag.i. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 1..7 19941, a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief'

se - flsd Page 1 of 17 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Doe No. 4'. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson Lead case: 9:08-ev-80111-.KAM Member case• (View Member Case)

ON Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No- Contact Order Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. Associate

4/21/2008) 05/22/2008 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe No. 4. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/29/2008 7. Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doe No. 4. (Attachments: # 1 Exhib

. 4 1. Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE

Corp. supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) moti to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, ibid.; Saniva . American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neuroloay. Inc. 40 F.3d 247, 251 .7 1994), a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief' re

lsd Page 1 of 15 LRJ U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 2:flasaAhd Member case: (View Member Case) Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Perso

file this document. (Is) (Entered: 05/20/2009) 05/20/2009 2.$ NOTICE by C.M.A. of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel And/Or Identify C.M.A. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery,

3/11/2008) 05/22/2008 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe No. 3. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/29/2008 5 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doe No. 3. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibi

plicable statute of limitations. WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the re ' f sought by Plaintiff. Robert D. C itton, Jr. Attorney f. Defendant Epstein Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also

. supra at 1664-65: ir While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) moti to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, ibid.. Sanivan . American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology. Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (C. .7 1994), a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief

- flsd ( Page 1 of 14 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Doe No. 5'. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Member case: (View Member Case] Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Cause: 28:1332 Diversit

eth A. Marra on 5/20/2009. (1c3) (Entered: 05/20/2009) 05/20/2009 9B NOTICE by of Filing Withdrawal of Previously RaisedObjections to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to ConaitAnd/Or Identify . in the Style of This Case and Motion to IdentlfrM. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Alter

4/17/2008) 05/22/2008 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe No. 5. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/29/2008 5 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doe No. 5. (Attachments: # I Exhibi

5 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S S

Corp., supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) moti to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations ibid.: Saniva . American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neuroloay. Inc. 40 F.3d 247, 251 .7 1994), a plaintiff's obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief" r

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants, DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel

KELLEN, Defendants, DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Rule 12(b)(6),

tion either under statutory or common law against Defendant EPSTEIN. Count I fails to plead any requisite elements o

CV-80811-MARRAIJOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants, DEFENDAN

rp. supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, ibid.. Sanivan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (C.A.7 1994), a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief

/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-Hurley-Hopkins JANE DOE NO. 7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO.7'S COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFER

CT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-Hurley-Hopkins JANE DOE NO. 7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO.7'S COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFERY EPSTEIN, by and through his un

7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMEN

3-Hurley-Hopkins JANE DOE NO. 7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION

p., supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, ibid.; Sanivan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc. 40 F.3d 247, 251 (C.A.7 1994), a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief'

2'2009 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Defendant's, Epstein. Motion To Dismiss, For More Definite Statement & To Strike Directed To Plaintiff Jane Doe's Amended Complaint,

Plaintiff. . .was called on the telephone by. . .Epstein and other employees. . ., and transported to. . .

Florida Civil Rico action is, at this time, only defendant Epstein. . . ." However, the RICO enterprise must be dis

.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Defendant's, Epstein. Moti

ic Corp., supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(6)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, Sanivan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and EFTA00234846 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009 Page 3 of 26 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 3

/2008 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S. EPSTEIN, MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, J

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S. EPSTEIN, MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFERY EPSTEIN, by and through his

19-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S. EPSTEIN, MOTIO

orp. supra at 1664-65: While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations ibid.. Sanivan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology. Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (C.A.7 1994), a plaintiffs obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief