Epstein Secrets

U' far public safety CI Quick Information Name: JEFFREY E EPSTEIN Person Type: Offender Legal Status: Rel

rification Records Mad Outs . Meld Worm/Moe • Investigative Traddng • Offender Bulletin • Document Management Quick Information Nuns: JEFFREY! EPSTEIN Perms Type: Offender Le el *Mum Released DOS SSP: License: Mk bon to receive notifications when offender Information is updated. Page 1 of 2

012 et Ms Palm Beach residence until 07/30/2011 Mr. Epstein came Into reoKtration and stated that he will be

i.coms. Ms, S. Pinney Terr.torial StuaLUlittsier iteuistre Frouram Manacer Wain islands Department of Justice Voted States )(Lulu Isjadds ite• Mr. Jeffrey Fustein - Travel NMISS.Pear Ms. Plante TNS IS IC OJVISt you of a Tallier lhoalfcation to if,. intents travel dans. Mr. fostem's Manna hs Yacaton Name in P

eral Comment: Per email from Mr. Eusten: • *This email was 729540 Michelle Stuart snit Num an external fnonPUSCII source.". (561) 688•4159 re Jefffrey Eysteln this is to advise you that Accepted 12/26/2018 my trio has been delayed and I am still at my palm beach resIdeece. . thank vou. General Comment:

came Into registration and stated that he will be in Palm Beach County resasho at his Palm Beach residence until 07/30/2012 General camment: Mr. Fostein came Into registration and mated that he will be Si Palm Beath County risk:lino at his Pam heath residence with 07/03/11 General Comment: Mr Egsr

tate.fl.us CERTIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN at the lorida Department of Law Enforce

ion under Florida public records law. In accordance with the order of judgment issued September 21, 2018, by the United States District Court for The Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee division in Case No. 4:16cv501-RH/CAS, FDLE, its agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and others in active participatio

uly 10, 2008, in the in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit In and For Palm Beach County, State of Florida, Case No. 50 2008CA020614 MBAF, Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein. and Sarah Kellen, based on the same factual allegations that she asserts in the instant case. Attached here to as Exhibit A is Plaintiff's First Am

T COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his

et, Defendant gives notice to the Court that issues pertaining to 18 U.S.C. §2255 in this motion to dismiss are also raised in the case of C.M.A. v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON, in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss directed to Plaintiff C.M.A.'s Amended Complaint, Plaintiff C.M.A.'s Response, and

I, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, AND S

69 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION

h an absurd result. In Martinez v. White, supra, the defendants sought to dismiss plaintiffs' 18 U.S.C. §2255 action based on forum non conveniens. The Northern District of California Court, relying on the rules of statutory construction, rejected plaintiffs' argument that Congress EFTA00222832 Case 9:09-cv-80469-

03/12/2009 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. EPSTEIN and Defendants, DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION, AND MOTION FOR MORE

ATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. EPSTEIN and Defendants, DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION, AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT; MOTION TO STRIKE, AND SU

adopted." Id. Plaintiffs position would subject Defendant EPSTEIN to a punishment that is not clearly prescribed —

aintiff, v. EPSTEIN and Defendants, DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLA

"actual damages." In Martinez v. White, supra, the defendants sought to dismiss plaintiffs' 18 U.S.C. §2255 action based on forum non conveniens. The Northern District of California Court, relying on the rules of statutory construction, rejected plaintiffs' argument that Congress had intended to abrogate the forum