Epstein Secrets

response (below). I know that you keep saying he is going to plead, and he will plead if we cave on everything, but I really do not think that Mr. Epstein is going to engage in serious negotiations until he sees the Indictment and shows up in mag court (preferably in flip- flops). In reviewing the indi

Twiller Smith, Victim Specialist, Federal Bureau of Investigation, West Palm Beach, Florida. Letter to Brad Edwards, Esq., dated July 9, 2008, RE: Jeffrey Epstein/C.W.: Notification of Identified Victim (2 pages); Author: A. Marie Villafana. Letter to Brad Edwards, Esq., dated July 9, 2008, RE: Jeffrey Epstein/S.R

E: Epstein (1 page) Letter to Jeffrey Sloman, dated December 7, 2007, RE: Jeffrey Epstein, Author: Lilly Ann Sanchez (1 page Affirmation signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1 page Notice of Hearing, and 1 page fax transmittal sheet, attached) E-mail, Marie Villafana to Jack Goldberger, dated June 28, 2008 11:31 a.m.,

Lilly Ann Sanchez (1 page Affirmation signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1 page Notice of Hearing, and 1 page f

Lilly Ann Sanchez (1 page Affirmation signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1 page Notice of Hearing, and 1 page fa

ve on everything, but I really do not think that Mr. Epstein is going to engage in serious negotiations until

Associate Deputy Attorney General Letter to John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, dated June 19, 2008, No Subject (14 pages Author: Stephanie D. Thacker, Allen Guthrie McHugh & Thomas, Charleston, West Letter to Jay Lefkowitz and Kennth Stan, dated June 23, 2008, No Subject (1 page), Author: John R

, vs UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Intervenor. I INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPST

PRECLUDE IMPOSITION OF THE EPSTEIN REMEDIES A. Mr. Epstein was not a Party to the Underlying Litigation and

o prosecuting what was, at heart, a local sex abuse case." See Jeffrey Sloman, Alex Acosta Acted with Professionalism and Integrity in Handling the Jeffrey Epstein Case, Miami Herald Op-Ed, Feb. 15, 2019. The USAO-SDFL's decision to enter into the NPA was also influenced by its consideration of the privacy interest

EEMENT 1 EFTA00299022 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND ARGUMENT I. PRINCIPLES OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS PRECLUDE IMPOSITION OF THE EPSTEIN REMEDIES A. Mr. Epstein was not a Party to the Underlying Litigation and There is no Judgment Against him B. There is no Judicial Finding of "Bad

teenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County on one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Fla. Stat. §796.07. See State v. Jeffiey E. Epstein, 50-2006-CF-009454-AXXX-MB. In or around November 2006, while the state court charge was pending, Mr. Epstein learned that the United States Attorn

ort for the application of the federal sex offense statutes to Mr. Epstein's alleged conduct. See Lefcourt Letter (Exhibit 1); see also Letter from Stephanie D. Thacker, former Principal Deputy Chief of CEOS, to John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, June 19, 2008 (attached as Exhibit ) (noting that

TRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned

o the case, suggesting in its plot that federal government had intervened improperly to prevent effective prosecution. See Law & Order Commemorates Jeffrey Epstein's Taste for Teen Hookers, http://gawker.comM5751094/law--order-commemorates-jeffrey-epsteins-taste-for- teen-hookers. The public interest in this ca

ld have been. There has long been suspicion that Jeffrey Epstein was receiving favorable treatment in the

from the 12 EFTA00209247 correspondence where Mr. Epstein's attorneys urged the United States Attorney's of

he correspondence was drafted by other attorneys, including Kenneth W. Starr, Jay P. Lefkowitz, Gerald P Lefcourt, Alan Dershowitz, Joe D. Whitley, Stephanie D. Thacker, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. It is not clear whether the motion is designed to cover these persons and, if so, what standing Roy Black (for instance) wo

m When the Witness Clearly Told the FBI that She was not a Victim 252. Undated Kirkland & Ellis LLP Summary of Misconduct Issues in the Matter of Jeffrey E. Epstein 253. Undated Draft Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 254. Undated Confidential Plea Negotiati

mination of Epstein re: 29. 9/1/2006 Palm Beach Count Police Department Incident Report (burglary) 30. 11/16/2006 Letter from 16 to Sanchez" re: Epstein's willingness to provide documents and information for the investi 1 ation 31. 1/16/2007'8 Taped Interview o 32. 1/16/2007'9 Taped Interview o

LP Summary of Misconduct Issues in the Matter of Jeffrey E. Epstein 253. Undated Draft Memorandum of Law i

LP Summary of Misconduct Issues in the Matter of Jeffrey E. Epstein 253. Undated Draft Memorandum of Law in

from Epstein to Indyke, forwarding email attaching draft letter re: inappropriateness of federal prosecution of Epstein 196. 6/19/2008 Letter from Stephanie D. Thacker (Allen Guthrie McHugh & Thomas, PLLC) to (Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General) re: 5/15/2008 letter from CEOS concerning federal prosecution

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: Fw: SORNA Letter Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:36:03 +0000 nothing attached On Fri, Oct 1, 2

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinberg Subj

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinb

iew of the individual state registration schemes-especially when such states have not implemented SORNA. Please let me know if you have questions. Stephanie D. Thacker Allen Guthrie & Thomas, PLLC 500 Lee Street East Suite 800 Charleston, West Virginia 25301 (direct) (fax) The information contained in this co