Epstein Secrets

t gov> 09/24/2007 01:27 PM To 'Jay Lefkowitz" cc ' lk(USAFLSV)- bcc Subject RE: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney Hi Jay — Sorry for the delay. The U.S. Attorney had a last-minute concern, that I think I fixed (it is i

A 0111W) SMITS 47-1(Mo2Y olitway BY P&(SIM11.9 Kenneth W, Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Starr ft Mt Area Mont Ft, 33132 0(2)941.9110.7olophoow MMI MILSOM - Amble 1 write in response to your November 2r letter, in which you

uld be so conitimed, our First Assistant informed Mr. Lefkowitt some weeks ago that this was not our position. As Mr. Ladkowitz baa noted, were Mr. F.pstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims M a subsequent Section 2255 suit would still have had some burden to move that they were "victims? it is a

the list is significantly shorter than that Once the list is provided to you, ifyou have a good faitlibasis for asserdng that a victim never met Mr. Bpsteie, we remain willing to listen and to modify the lid if you convince as of your position. _Dully, let meaddress raurobjections to thedraft Victim Not

ssistant U.S. Attorney 1 EFTA00289840 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT • THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT • • Name: Jeffrey-E. Epstein Plea: Guilty Case No. Charge Count_ Lesser Decree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OBCF009381AMB Procuring Pers

e list Is significantly shorter than that. Once the list is provided to you, ifyou have a good faith basis for asserting that a victim never met Mr. Bp stein, we remain willing to listen and to modify the list if you convince os of yourposItion. Filially, letme address yourobjections to thedraft Victim N

LL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SF.111F.IvIENT Horne: Jeffrey E. Epttein Plea: Gully „X i Case No. ghargatt

LL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SF.111F.IvIENT Horne: Jeffrey E. Epttein Plea: Gully „X i Case No. ghargatt

cts check and it looks alright. Also, to address Mr. Epstein's concern regarding the list of names, I wanted

d under seal, and the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Conn. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and expecte, so no one sh

W NY ~0929104. TXT 119 THE WITNESS: Yeah. BY MR. TEIN: Q. And your father filed a lawsuit, the first lawsuit for fifty million dollars against Mr. Epstein without consulting you, correct? Q. And your father had a lawyer file the first fawsuit on your behalf for fifty million dollars against Mr. Epste

tle bit about the introduction, how PR introduced you to Jeffrey. Okay. So let's break that down a little She toid you you could go over there to Jeffrey Epstein's hovse and give a massage? A. Right. Q. When she said go give a massage did she tell you what she meant by that? A. Just are -- no. Just a massage.

tioa, ine. Page 5 : And | ES a frienc of yours at the A. Yes. Q. Okay. And tell me a little bit about the introduction, how PR introduced you to Jeffrey. Okay. So let's break that down a little She toid you you could go over there to Jeffrey Epstein's hovse and give a massage? A. Right. Q. When s

reimbursement); records of the dates when services were performed and the hours worked; telephone logs or records of dates of communications with Mr. Epstem {or with a third party on Mr. Epstein’s behalf); appointment calendars/datebooks and the like (whether in hard copy or electronic form) for any perio

AFANA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY Dated: vA i La Dated: GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012595 By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read and explained to him. Epstein h

e first lawsuit for fifty million dollars against Mr. Epstein without consulting you, correct? Q. And your fat

ed under seal, and the Palm Beach Police Department’s probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one sho

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

Y. 1655 Pike DeleePh.„,.. .ML lt Fst!ii!lefleach, IR. »CI 1 0 C) Par 1 sprat your tether rear*, taw fifty sullierdoller 2 leoseit arrest Jeffrey ipater says that pH, lir with 3 your aunt and tale ad bar bra liar trots le that I Cerrees7 S Us. 6 0. Iles ray have you bra lira with P

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of hi s obligations pursuant to th

have prepared documents to charge at least one of Mr. Epstein's lady friends in state court. If they can push

thei't NW ass. sir. O. 00 yea know who Doff fey Slow NI A. N. Pie. 0. Clo yet hew who J'effroy Mnia 14/ A. 0. That.. the layer who flest and Spytein os ynr nYlf. tleht7 500•11 au In. Noun •Pmetted piet hally any M. LIN101.0i hey coriertetlere that ~et had with At. Soso 'Nordin.; Not Issue. y

under seal, and the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one s

(Ex. C.) During the interview, Jane Doe 2 again denied being involved in or a victim of any criminal activity and made statements meant to exculpate Jeffrey Epstein. (See id.) Jane Doe 2 also informed me and the FBI agents who were present that she "hope[d] . . . nothing happens to [Epstein] because he's an awes

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 4 of 176 individuals who had been identified as potential victims of Epstein, but whom the investigative team had not yet interviewed and had not necessarily determined were in fact victims of a federal offense or came under

acuum. We have read many infiruntriatory remarks the Town of Palm Bewail Police Chief has made to the media about the state court's handling of the Jeffrey. Epstein investigation. The polkachief s remarks frighten both myself and my client. Tam aware that the town police have prepared dc•cuments to char

aid. 14 15 16 you write that? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. 19 A. 20 informed that it was a deposition. 21 22 about what happened when you went to Jeff Epstein's house Q. You wrote in this exhibit, "I got some stupid court s-h-i-t on the 20th. Bull s-h-i-t." Didn't Referring to this deposition, didn't you?

ey Epstein, including "[Jane Doe 2] never touched Mr. Epstein in a sexual way and Mr. Epstein never touched [J

under seal, and the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one s

discuss the potential representative. The person I am thinking of has run a preliminary conflicts check and it looks alright. Also, to address Mr. Epstein's concern regarding the list of names, I wanted to tell you that I have compiled a list of 34 confirmed minors. There are six others, whose names w

cts check and it looks alright. Also, to address Mr. Epstein's concern regarding the list of names, I wanted

DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 100224675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 December 13, 2007 I am writing not

t 53rd Street New York, New York 100224675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S Australian Ave, Ste 400

under seal, and the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one s

09/24/2007 01:27 PM To "Jay Lefkowitz" <[email protected]> cc 'Martin Weinberg' <owlm otidnet. . bee Subject RE: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney Hi Jay — Sorry for the delay. The U.S. Attorney had a last-minute concern, that I think I fixed (it is i

cts check and it looks alright. Also, to address Mr. Epstein's concern regarding the list of names, I wanted

DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 100224675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 December 13, 2007 I am writing not

t 53rd Street New York, New York 100224675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S Australian Ave, Ste 400

under seal, and the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one s

ELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 December 13, 2007 I am writing not

FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 December 13, 2007 I am writing not to respond to your asserted "policy concerns" regarding Mr. Epstein's Non- Prosecution Agreement, which will be addressed by the United States Attorney, but the time has come for me to respond to the ever-increasing

53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: 500 S. Australian Ave, Ste 40

pond to your asserted "policy concerns" regarding Mr. Epstein's Non- Prosecution Agreement, which will be addre

under seal, and the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one s

nks. arsimmillellmas as I/2%1.1y Lett " 4.1Lefkowftzaltirkland.cram, sr .goo, •Acosta, Nex (USAFL8)- 11728/2007 04:48 PM <Alexaoostagusdolgov> SuEpstein: Victim Natific44ion Letter act ct Dear Jay: masked that T forward the victim notification letter to you. It is attached. Thank you. <Wictim N

right to be treated with fhimen and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy. I am writing to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement containing the following terms. First, Mr. Epstein ag

g to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, and Mr. Epstein and

agreement entered into by the United States and Mr. Epstein in a timely fashion. Tomorrow will make one full

runder seal, aid the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one s