Epstein Secrets

ling to pay for the transcript. 2. Your proposed stipulation indicates that in September 2007 the U.S. Attorney's Office reached an agreement with Epstein to resolve the case, which was then modified in Ontober and December of that year. While this seems plausible, to stipulate to the facts, I would o

0 0002 5519 8503 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Dear As you are aware, we represent several of the young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate for a

his desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

e young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty

criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further urge you to take t

Y FILPFAike D.C. ELECTRONIC JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. OUST. CT. S. D. Of FLA. • MIAMI I hereby certify that, as a member of the Bar of this Court, I have carefully examined this matter and it is a true emergency. I further certify that the necessity for this emergency hearing has not been cau

It has utterly failed to even offer any such cause — much less show that it is good cause. Second, the Government — with the apparent contrivance of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys — has made inaccurate representations about the nature of the non-prosecution agreement in its notices to the victims and in its filing b

well as to the Court — lies with Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys'. See Gov't Response at 5 ("the [inaccurate] victim notification letter was provided to Epstein's attorneys prior to being sent, who approved the language of which the petitioners now complain."). The apparent approval by Jeffrey Epstein's at

-2006 Amendments version of the law applies. See Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, for More Definite Statement

he terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffre

made a part of the record and the extent to which Mr. Epstein, through his attorneys, was culpable. Sincerely

g the appropriate application to be authorized to file through the Court's electronic filing system. Movant consents to be designated as a member of the Bar of this Court with whom the Court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding the conduct of the case, upon EFTA00177245 Case 9:08-cv• 8-KAM Docum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802,

08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A HEARING, FINDING THAT EPSTEIN IS IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF THE COURT'S TWO ORDERS FORBIDDING HARASSMENT AND INDIRECT CONTACT, FOR APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS AND ADDITIONAL REMEDIES INCLUD

of criminal contempt. To put the matter bluntly, defendant Epstein is intimidating Jane Doe in violation of three j

. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. Related Cases: 08-8

8-CV-80893-CIV-MARFtAJJOHNSON JANE DOE Plaintiff v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant CERTIFICATION OF EMERGENCY I hereby certify that, as a member of the Bar of this Court, I have carefully examined this matter and it is a true emergency. I further certify that the necessity for this emergency hearing has not been cau

f his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, I will address facts related to C.W., T.M., and S.R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. 'Please note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to C.W. and T.

ney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("the Office") entered into negotiations to resolve the investigation. At that

States Attorney assigned to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. The case was investigated by the Federal

f the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern

SON CERTIFICATION OF EMERGENCY JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN NI. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. 01ST. CT. S.O. Of FLA. • MIAMI I hereby certify that, as a member of the Bar of this Court, I have carefully examined this matter and it is a true emergency. I further certify that the necessity for this emergency hearing has not been cau

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:09-CV-80591-KAM Jane Doe 101, Plaintiff, vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. MOTION FOR LIMITED APPEARANCE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILINGS In accorda

0591-KAM Jane Doe 101, Plaintiff, vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. MOTION FOR LIMITED APPEARANCE, CONS

:09-CV-80591-KAM Jane Doe 101, Plaintiff, vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. MOTION FOR LIMITED APPEARAN

te for the practice of law, and is authorized to file through the Court's electronic filing system. Movant consents to be designated as a member of the Bar of this Court with whom the Court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding the conduct of the case, upon whom filings shall be served, who shall be

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:09-CV-80591-KAM Jane Doe 101, Plaintiff, vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. MOTION FOR LIMITED APPEARANCE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILINGS In accorda

0591-KAM Jane Doe 101, Plaintiff, vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. MOTION FOR LIMITED APPEARANCE, CONS

:09-CV-80591-KAM Jane Doe 101, Plaintiff, vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. MOTION FOR LIMITED APPEARAN

te for the practice of law, and is authorized to file through the Court's electronic filing system. Movant consents to be designated as a member of the Bar of this Court with whom the Court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding the conduct of the case, upon whom filings shall be served, who shall be