Epstein Secrets

an appeal brought by defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Defendant Epstein challenges the designation that he was given unde

OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, —against— JEFFREY E. EPsTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. APPENDIX CYRUS R

individuals who were identified as victims 9 of Mr. Epstein's conduct, and Judge Marra's 10 order says that

ly 23, 2006 v -v• le a eLgo.b•J 14. 01 UJJ ...EPSTEIN, JEFFREY ALIAS PLUME OVER tunics. O JACKET ft:

June 30, 2008 A35 Palm Beach Sheriffs Offiee-Beeking-Gard-for-Jeffrey--Epstein dated June 30, 2008 A47 EFTA00231444 ii PAGE Order Granting Jeffrey E. Epstein's Motion for Travel, dated December 18, 2009 A48 Letter from Florida Department of Corrections Regarding Termination of Supervision, dated July 2

, P.C. S Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND t ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Neal -4611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Esptein. -2- EFTA00231448 A3 Appellant's Notice of Appeal, dated February 9, 2011 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPL

OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, —against— JEFFREY E. EPsTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. APPENDIX CYRUS

aves messages. Sgt . entered the room and explained to that based on her own statements, she had implicated herself by bringing underage girls to Epstem's house. provided cellular telephone numbers for the girls she had mentioned previously. Additionally, she also provided possible addresses and are

ssage table with a sheet on it. Epstein entered through a door and exited wearing only a towel. informed. that they were oing to provide a massage on Epstein N asked why were they doing this instead of modeling lingerie, explained to. that this was his routine and to rub his calves and feet. Epstein had t

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 11 We cited a case called mariner versus Baker 3 -- So. 39, So.2d 608 First District 1989. In the Mariner case, this was not a usual incident report and the Court, I know your Honor previously did a great deal of personal injury w

ted June 30, 2008 A35 Palm Beach Sheriffs-Office Booking-Card-for Jeffrey Epstein, dated June 30, 2008 A47 EFTA00232564 PAGE Order Granting Jeffrey E. Epstein's Motion for Travel, dated December 18, 2009 A48 Letter from Florida Department of Corrections Regarding Termination of Supervision, dated July 2

Palm Beach Police Department Agency ORIN FLO 500600 . table, straddling Epstein to massage his back. While doing this her buttocks were touching Epsteins. ' was instructed to return to the ground at which time Epstein turned to have his chest rubbed. " I advised she was sure he was masturbating ba

P.C. S dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, 111.1611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Jeffrey E. Esptein. -2- EFTA00232568 A3 Appellant's Notice of Appeal, dated February 9, 2011 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPL

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. APP

in in the kitchen of the house. She was also introduced to a white female known to her as She was led upstairs to the main bedroom known to her as Jeff Epstein's bedroom. > arranged the massage table and covered the table with a sheet. She brought out the massage oils and ler ern next to the massage bed. t

an appeal brought by defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Defendant Epstein challenges the designation that he was given unde

MENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. APPE

ert Critton and Jack 17 Goldberger on behalf of Mr. Epstein as well 18 as Barbara Compiani from the office

. SUSAN S. WIGGINS. R.P.R. and OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00232527 11 1 We cited a case called Mariner versus 2 Baker 3 -- So. 39, So.2d 608 First District 3 1989. In the Mariner case, this was not a 4 usual incident report and the Court, I know 5 your Honor previously did a great deal of 6 perso

nt. Post, who 13 wants to go first? 14 MS. SHULLMAN: Mr. Edwards. 15 THE COURT: Mr. Edwards. 16 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, inasmuch as 17 Mr. Epstein is relying on Judge Marra's 18 order to support the argument that the 19 nonprosecution agreement needs to remain 20 sealed, I'd like to addres

H JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION 3 STATE OF FLORIDA ) 4 ) vs. ) CASE No. 2008CF009381AXX 5 ) JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) 6 ) Defendant. ) CERTIFIED COPY 7 ) 8 PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 9 PRESIDING: HONORABLE JEFFREY COLBATH 10 APPEARANCES: 11 ON

) 4 ) vs. ) CASE No. 2008CF009381AXX 5 ) JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) 6 ) Defendant. ) CERTIFIED COPY

s. 16 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, inasmuch as 17 Mr. Epstein is relying on Judge Marra's 18 order to support

. SUSAN S. WIGGINS. R.P.R. and OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180903 11 1 We cited a case called Mariner versus 2 Baker 3 -- So. 39, So.2d 608 First District 3 1989. In the Mariner case, this was not a 4 usual incident report and the Court, I know 5 your Honor previously did a great deal of 6 perso

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, Intervenors.' ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762

Background Facts 4 Epstein Attempts to Intimidate His Victims by Filing Suit Against and 5-11 Retaliates Against their Lawyer ARGUMENT 12-26 EPSTEIN'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE EPSTEIN WAITED UNTIL THE EVE OF TRIAL, MORE THAN TEN MONTHS AFTER THE CASE HAD BEEN SET F

APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually,

ision AG of anything whatsoever having to do with Mr. Epstein's prosecution of that one-count Complaint agains

equired reversal. Like Epstein here, the plaintiff argued that strict compliance with Rule 1.440 was required. The plaintiff relied upon a previous First District opinion, Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc., 492 So.2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), in which the court adopted a bright line rule that strict compl

Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331585 EFTA_OO2O43 I I EFTA02729297 • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., and B.B., Respondents. Pending in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and f

of two orders unsealing a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum (collectively the "NPA"), which are records of the trial court below. State v. Epstein, Case Nos. 06 CF9454AMB, 08 CF9381AMB. Petitioner was investigated by the State of Florida for felony solicitation of children for prostitution. (

FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PAL

rd parties" and identifies those third parties as Mr. Epstein's co- conspirators. (Petition at 15). Again, Mr.

TMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, Appellant, v. FLORIDA SUGAR CANE LEAGUE, INC., Appellee. No. 91.3128. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. Oct. 29. 1992. *1267 An appeal from the Leon County Circuit Cowl; P. Kevin Davey, Judge. Robert G. Gough, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Dept. of

f his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, I will address facts related to C.W., T.M., and S.R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. 'Please note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to C.W. and T.

thern District of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client, On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) and 796.03 (procurement of minors

401 (561)8204711 Facsimile: (561)8204777 July 9, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE Brad Edwards, Esq. The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, [.LC Re: Jeffrey 4..stein/QIN...la NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Mr. Edwards: By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southe

ceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein EFTA00233829 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document

RTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, Appellant, I FLORIDA SUGAR CANE LEAGUE, INC., Appellee. No. 91-3128. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. Oct. 29, 1992. *1267 An appeal from the Leon County Circuit Court; P. Kevin Davey, Judge. Robert G. Gough, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Dept. of

which of his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly,) will address facts related to , S. and S.R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. 'Please note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to III and In

fteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. This charge was based upon the offenses alleged in paragraph 1 of the petition. Second, while Epstein has been under federal investigation, he has not been charged in EFTA00183654 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/20

treet, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020. Re: Jeffrey E eir m/SaVhiii: NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICT

ve the federal investigation. al 5. At that time, Mr. Epstein had been charged by the State of Florida with so

EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, Appellant, FLORIDA SUGAR CANE LEAGUE, INC., Appellee. No. 91-3128. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. Oct. 29, 1992. *1267 An appeal from the Leon County Circuit Court; P. Kevin Davey, Judge. Robert G. Gough, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Dept. of