Epstein Secrets

privacy. 5. This is strictly a "fishing expedition" unrelated to any aspect of this case. A similar Request to Produce was served in the casel v. Jeffrey E. Epstein and , Case No. 502008CA025129XXXXMB Al, in front of Judge Garrison. A copy of the objection to the Notice is attached as Exhibit "B" and Judge Garr

BOARD CERTIFIED CVO-TRIAL LAWYER Sent by Fax and U.S. Mail Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP April 13, 2009 Re: Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmukumALINVBSTIOMOR BARBARA M. NkKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALE

kKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RITA H. BUDNYK OP COUNSEL Dear Sid: Please be informed thal subpoenaed deposition in thel.L. Epstein case on April 16th, 2009 is hereby cancelled. Cordially Robert D. Critton, Jr. RDC/clz cc: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. L•A•W•Y•E •R•S TELEPHONE

py of the case law and Florida Statutes cited in Defendant Epstein' otion to Dismiss, For More Definite Statement, a

ar Request to Produce was served in the casel v. Jeffrey E. Epstein and , Case No. 502008CA025129XXXXMB Al,

ar Request to Produce was served in the casel v. Jeffrey E. Epstein and , Case No. 502008CA025129XXXXMB Al,

OW CAB Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Mr. Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, pur

2.westlaw.com/print/printstreameaspx?s plitttprfl=HTMLEttifm=NotSet&mt... 4/10/2009 EFTA00722723 Page 3 of 3 800 So.2d 706 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D283I (Cite as: 800 So.2d 706) (Fla.1999), the supreme court again discussed 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D2831 Langston and, without expressl

08CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPORTIN COMES NOW, Intervener,.. and files s Response endant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the

y's office that triggers as a 13 result of this plea agreement. In other 14 words, they have signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any 17 offense upon his successful taking of this 18 plea today. That is a confidential 19 documen

RCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381A)OC STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, ■. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civ

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

09454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JE'FFREY INTERVENER'S E O u. 0 T i TAY AND UPPO

signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 16 Southern District of Florida for any

00 . . . Page 3of 3 ens, FL 33410 (facsimile) T. KUVIN, Esq. ar No.: EFTA00232447 Page 2 of Wdstlaw. 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389.24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant. v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appel lee. No

all those conditions you two have agreed to? MS. BELOHLAVEK: Yes, Your Honor. MR. GOLDBERGER: With the court's amendments, yes. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein, do you understand? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma'am. THE COURT: I need the defendant to 14 sign number D where I had an a added to 15 victim, and G,

Z.= TO REORDER CALL 9546/49599 EFTA00180769 PLEA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty _1S Case No. Charge Count Lesser Decree 06CF009454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL 08CF009381AMB Procuring

tkido by them. . Instructed byt op/07.02.08 Superela& Moor pbfeackt jagt 7 of 8 Form Itovike 034 tiet EFTA00180788 11/LO/Zdtlti 333 ,a4g2 JEFFILEY EPSTEIN CASE(1302008CF009381A.XXX148 • COURT °BMW PA'YMZIff$ • • • ▪ • • • • . . l••111,AI. I •IT\olkl•ILI "Vom Wen sms • . . • ' i . .

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E. Epstein Plea: Guilty _1S Case No. Charge Coun

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

: With the court's amendments, yes. THE COURT: Mr. Epstein, do you understand? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma'am.

200 alm Beach Garde i 410 T. KUVIN, Esq. ar No.: 089737 Page 3of 3 EFTA00180827 Page 2 of I I Westlaw 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 Ha. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant, v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appellee. No.

4AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY INTERVENER'S AND S ON TO STAY OF LAW COMES NOW, Intervener, M. and fil 's Response ndant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay, and states: In their motion, Defendant asks the Court to stay it mg on the production of the NPA agreement pending review by the

y's office that triggers as a 13 result of this plea agreement. In other 14 words, they have signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 26 Southern District of Florida for. any 17 offense upon his successful taking of this 18 plea today. That is a confidential 19 docume

signed off and said they 15 will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the 26 Southern District of Florida for. any

IRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2006CF009454AXX, 2008CF009381AXX STATE, vs. EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, M. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civ

as it has been properly sealed. Furthermore, as Defendant EPSTEIN has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to s

b2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLEecifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00231328 Page 3 of 11 7691.2d 389 769 .2d 389 4 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 52d 389) [5] Infants 211 C:=85 211 Infants 211VII Actions 211k76 Guardian Ad Litem or Next Friend 21Ik85 k. Duties and Liab

iffs. I ORDER GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGM I NT THIS CAUSE came before the court on Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the Fourth Amended Counterclaim filed herein by Counter- Plaintiff and the court having reviewed the file and

d applicable precedent, having heard argument of counsel and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereupon ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Mr. EPSTEIN filed suit against Mr. EDWARDS and Mr. EDWARDS thereafter filed a Counterclaim against Mr. EPSTEIN. Mr. EPSTEIN later dismissed his Complaint withou

IVIL DIVISION -AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOT

mises, it is hereupon ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. Mr. EPSTEIN filed suit against Mr. EDWARDS and Mr. EDWARDS th

Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Bchevarria, McCalla. Ravmer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 Sold 380 (Fla. 2007) and Wolfe v. Foreman 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). The court finds these cases to be not only persuasive but binding. The court is bound by the holding of Levin. that all acti

Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access c) B.B.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential A hearing was conducted on these matters on June 25, 2009. The Court notes that Mr. Goldberger, Esq. and

4AXXMB 1. The State of Florida charged the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, with Felony Solicitation of Prostitution. 2. The State of Florida and Mr. Epstein came to a negotiated resolution of the charges. Part of that resolution included an agreement entered into between Mr. Epstein and the United State

, p.m. with appearances 8 as hereinbefore noted, to wit: 9 THEREUPON: 10 THE COURT: Let me call up the case 11 of the state of Florida versus Jeffrey 12 Epstein. Let me have counsel announce 13 their appearances for the record. 14 MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman of 15 16 17 18 you again, g

on of Prostitution. 2. The State of Florida and Mr. Epstein came to a negotiated resolution of the charges.

Page 9 of 11 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. Habit:, 622 So.2