Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 67-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 PggigleQff bf 8 703 So.2d 1076 703 So.2d 1076.22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375.23 Fla. L. Weekly D169 (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. Kimberly BALAS and Teresa Shumate, Pe

009 EFTA00222136 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 68-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 Pgicile (41-Of 8 703 So.2d 1076 703 Sold 1076, 22 Pla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169 (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076) ness for the plaintiffs cannot be used against the plaintiffs or witness in any other inve

2.westlaw.com/print/printstreameaspx?s plitttprfl=HTMLEttifm=NotSet&mt... 4/10/2009 EFTA00722723 Page 3 of 3 800 So.2d 706 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D283I (Cite as: 800 So.2d 706) (Fla.1999), the supreme court again discussed 800 So.2d 706,26 Fla. L. Weekly D2831 Langston and, without expressl

Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Bchevarria, McCalla. Ravmer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 Sold 380 (Fla. 2007) and Wolfe v. Foreman 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). The court finds these cases to be not only persuasive but binding. The court is bound by the holding of Levin. that all acti

b2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLEecifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00231328 Page 3 of 11 7691.2d 389 769 .2d 389 4 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 52d 389) [5] Infants 211 C:=85 211 Infants 211VII Actions 211k76 Guardian Ad Litem or Next Friend 21Ik85 k. Duties and Liab

00 . . . Page 3of 3 ens, FL 33410 (facsimile) T. KUVIN, Esq. ar No.: EFTA00232447 Page 2 of Wdstlaw. 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389.24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant. v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appel lee. No

200 alm Beach Garde i 410 T. KUVIN, Esq. ar No.: 089737 Page 3of 3 EFTA00180827 Page 2 of I I Westlaw 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 Ha. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant, v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appellee. No.

Page 9 of 11 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. Habit:, 622 So.2