7
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
21 / 7
Mentions
erefore order her detained. The charges in this case are unquestionably serious: the Indictment alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and abused young girls for years. As a result of her disturbing and callous conduct, Maxwell now faces the very
S.C. § 2423 and 2; and two counts of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The charges arise from a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls at Epstein's properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico, between approximately 1994 and 1997. During that time, Maxwell had a personal and professional r
eges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and
ential sentence, the more probable the flight risk is, especially considering the strong case of the government . . . .") (quoting United States v. Alindato—Perez, 627 F. Supp. 2d 58, 66 (D.P.R. 2009)). Here, the defendant is facing a statutory maximum of decades in prison. This fact alone would provide
erefore order her detained. The charges in this case are unquestionably serious: the Indictment alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and abused young girls for years. As a result of her disturbing and callous conduct, Maxwell now faces the very
S.C. § 2423 and 2; and two counts of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The charges arise from a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls at Epstein's properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico, between approximately 1994 and 1997. During that time, Maxwell had a personal and professional r
eges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and
ential sentence, the more probable the flight risk is, especially considering the strong case of the government . . . .") (quoting United States v. Alindato—Perez, 627 F. Supp. 2d 58, 66 (D.P.R. 2009)). Here, the defendant is facing a statutory maximum of decades in prison. This fact alone would provide
erefore order her detained. The charges in this case are unquestionably serious: the Indictment alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and abused young girls for years. As a result of her disturbing and callous conduct, Maxwell now faces the very
S.C. § 2423 and 2; and two counts of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The charges arise from a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls at Epstein's properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico, between approximately 1994 and 1997. During that time, Maxwell had a personal and professional r
eges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and
potential sentence, the more probable the flight risk is, especially considering the strong case of the government . .") (quoting United States v. Alindato—Perez, 627 F. Supp. 2d 58, 66 (D.P.R. 2009)). Here, the defendant is facing a statutory maximum of decades in prison. This fact alone would provide
erefore order her detained. The charges in this case are unquestionably serious: the Indictment alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and abused young girls for years. As a result of her disturbing and callous conduct, Maxwell now faces the very
S.C. § 2423 and 2; and two counts of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The charges arise from a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls at Epstein's properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico, between approximately 1994 and 1997. During that time, Maxwell had a personal and professional r
eges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and
ential sentence, the more probable the flight risk is, especially considering the strong case of the government . . . .") (quoting United States v. Alindato—Perez, 627 F. Supp. 2d 58, 66 (D.P.R. 2009)). Here, the defendant is facing a statutory maximum of decades in prison. This fact alone would provide
erefore order her detained. The charges in this case are unquestionably serious: the Indictment alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and abused young girls for years. As a result of her disturbing and callous conduct, Maxwell now faces the very
S.C. § 2423 and 2; and two counts of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The charges arise from a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls at Epstein's properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico, between approximately 1994 and 1997. During that time, Maxwell had a personal and professional r
eges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and
ential sentence, the more probable the flight risk is, especially considering the strong case of the government . . . .") (quoting United States v. Alindato—Perez, 627 F. Supp. 2d 58, 66 (D.P.R. 2009)). Here, the defendant is facing a statutory maximum of decades in prison. This fact alone would provide
erefore order her detained. The charges in this case are unquestionably serious: the Indictment alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and abused young girls for years. As a result of her disturbing and callous conduct, Maxwell now faces the very
Page: EFTA00018506 →eges that Ghislaine Maxwell, in partnership with Jeffrey Epstein, a serial sexual predator, exploited and
Page: EFTA00018506 →S.C. § 2423 and 2; and two counts of perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The charges arise from a scheme to sexually abuse underage girls at Epstein's properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico, between approximately 1994 and 1997. During that time, Maxwell had a personal and professional r
Page: EFTA00018507 →ential sentence, the more probable the flight risk is, especially considering the strong case of the government . . . .") (quoting United States v. Alindato—Perez, 627 F. Supp. 2d 58, 66 (D.P.R. 2009)). Here, the defendant is facing a statutory maximum of decades in prison. This fact alone would provide
Page: EFTA00018510 →Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice admission pending) La
Page: EFTA00018515 →.uk/newstarlicle-7344765/Spotlight-turns- Jeffrey-Epsteins-fixer-Ghislaine-Maxwell-suicide.html• Ghislaine M
Page: EFTA00018531 →xwell after his suicide — but will she be prosecuted?, Daily Mail (Aug. 10, 2019) https://svww.dailymail.co.uk/newstarlicle-7344765/Spotlight-turns- Jeffrey-Epsteins-fixer-Ghislaine-Maxwell-suicide.html• Ghislaine Manvell: the woman accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein groom girls, The Guardian (Aug. 12, 2019), htt
Page: EFTA00018531 →ngly, the asserted potential for a long sentence does not meet the government's burden of persuasion.14 14 The government relies on United States v. Alindato-Perez, 627 F. Supp. 2d 58, 66 (D.P.R. 2009), cited approvingly by United States v. Moscaritolo, No. 10 Cr. 4 (JL), 2010 WL 309679, at •2 (D.N.H. Jan
Page: EFTA00018536 →Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Alindato

Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Audrey Strauss
PERSON
United Kingdom
LOCATIONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATIONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Anderson
PERSONPerez
PERSONBradford
LOCATION
New England
LOCATIONLaFontaine
PERSONGleeson
PERSONCasteneda
PERSON
Ferranti
PERSONMoscaritolo
PERSONPatriarca
PERSONUnited States Customs and Border Protection
ORGANIZATION