Epstein Secrets

21 LRJ, MEDREQ, REF_DISCOV U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80119-1CAM Doe v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson Member case: (View Member Case) Case: 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Caus

ON Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No- Contact Order Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plaintiffi Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order filed by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. Associate

red: 02/08/2008) 05/22/2008 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/22/2008 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jeffrey Epstein served on 5/7/2008, Answer due 5/27/2008. (Ik) (Entere

FTA00175604 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 17 of 21 05/20/2009 Ma NOTICE be. of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raise Lions to Defendant. Jetey Epstein's Motion to Ag And/Or IdentifyMf. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identi . in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Alternati

. 2 I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S S

legations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him "a massage for monetary comp

oose his Fifth Amendment rights, he will expose himself to an adverse inference at the summary-judgment stage and at trial. See generally. Wehlingl. Columbia Broad. Sys., 611 F.2d 1026, 1027 (5th Cir. 1980) (observing that "invocation of the privilege would be subject to the drawing of an adverse inference by

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 13 JANE DOE NO. 2, vs JEFFREY EPSTEIN. I JANE DOE NO. 3, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. I JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. I JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. I UNITED STATES D

OF MOTION TO STAY ' This motion is filed under seal because the deferred-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein. discussed herein, contains a confidentiality clause. A motion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38

between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein. discussed herein, contains a confidentiality cla

ion In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on allegations similar to those in the i

ose his Fifth Amendment rights, he will expose himself to an adverse inference at the summary-judgment stage and at trial. See generally, Wehling v. Columbia Broad Sys., 611 F.2d 1026, 1027 (5th Cir. 1980) (observing that "invocation of the privilege would be subject to the drawing of an adverse inference by the

which of his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly,) will address facts related to , S. and S.R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. 'Please note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to III and In

fteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. This charge was based upon the offenses alleged in paragraph 1 of the petition. Second, while Epstein has been under federal investigation, he has not been charged in EFTA00183654 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/20

treet, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020. Re: Jeffrey E eir m/SaVhiii: NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICT

ve the federal investigation. al 5. At that time, Mr. Epstein had been charged by the State of Florida with so

ose his Fifth Amendment rights, he will expose himself to an adverse inference at the summary-judgment stage and at trial. See generally, Wehlingl. Columbia Broad. Sys, 611 F.2d 1026, 1027 (5th Cir. 1980) (observing that "invocation of the privilege would be subject to the drawing of an adverse inference by t

e remaining sealed materials. I. BACKGROUND A. Jeffrey Epstein's Conviction and the CVRA Suit The origins of thi

ffrey Epstein's Conviction and the CVRA Suit The origins of this case lie in a decade-old criminal proceeding against financier Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). On June 30, 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state charges of soliciting, and procuring a person under the age of eighteen for, prostitu

e remaining sealed materials. I. BACKGROUND A. Jeffrey Epstein's Conviction and the CVRA Suit The orig

ributes to public understanding of the rule of law" and "validates [its] claim of functioning as surrogates for the public."J9 48 Westmoreland v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk Cly., 457 U.S. 596, 606, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 73

remaining sealed materials. I. BACKGROUND A. Jeffrey Epstein's Conviction and the CVRA Suit The origins of this

Jeffrey Epstein's Conviction and the CVRA Suit The origins of this case lie in a decade-old criminal proceeding against financier Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). On June 30, 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state charges of soliciting, and procuring a person under the age of eighteen for, prostitut

remaining sealed materials. I. BACKGROUND A. Jeffrey Epstein's Conviction and the CVRA Suit The origi

ial system would be well served were our common law courts to revitalize this crucial qualification to the litigation privilege. " Westmoreland v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk Cty., 457 U.S. 596, 606 (1982)). 49 Richmon